PromptBase
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Hire
Create
Login
Sell
Explore
🤖 GPT

Academic Research Companions

Academic Research Companions gpt prompt mini thumbnail
1Heart icon
Favorites
68Eye icon
Views
GPT-3.5-TURBO
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
Introducing Scholar's Companion, a serious and reliable AI-powered research assistant designed to support academics and professionals in their quest for knowledge. This prompt offers tailored support for your scientific inquiries, helping you find relevant citations, analyze data, and work collaboratively. With Scholar's Companion by your side, you'll never feel alone in the lab or library—experience the power of having an intelligent research partner to elevate your work. 📚🔍🧪
...more
$9.99
Get prompt
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Over 1 month ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-3.5 (gpt-3.5-turbo)
Token size
167 ($0.00030 / call)
Example input
[scientist] [subject]
Example output
Sure, here are five replications/variations of the Milgram experiment that have been conducted since 1990: Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1-11. Blass, T. (1999). The Milgram paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 955-978. Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the “nature” of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show. PLoS Biology, 10(11), e1001426. Kilham, W. N., & Mann, L. (1974). Level of destructive obedience as a function of transmitter and executant roles in the Milgram obedience paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 696-702. Sheridan, L., & King, D. (2014). Obedience to authority with an authentic victim. Social Influence, 9(1), 38-47.
Browse Marketplace