Prompt Details
Model
(claude-5-opus)
Token size
2,063
Example input
[APP_DESCRIPTION]: A habit-tracking app for building daily routines with streak tracking, reminders, and simple progress charts; targets people trying to build consistent habits like exercise, reading, or meditation
[TARGET_KEYWORDS]: 'habit tracker' (high volume, high competition), 'daily routine app' (medium volume/competition), 'streak tracker' (lower volume/competition)
[PLATFORM]: iOS App Store
[COMPETITOR_LISTINGS]: Habitica emphasizes gamification and RPG elements in its title and screenshots. Streaks emphasizes minimalism and simplicity, '6 tasks max' as a differentiator
Example output
# App Store Listing Optimization
## Untitled Habit-Tracking App — iOS App Store
---
### CARD 1 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
No app/brand name was supplied, so the title options below are keyword-forward working titles — swap in your actual brand name if you have one, ideally placed before the keyword phrase (e.g., "{Brand}: Habit Tracker").
**Highest-leverage change to make first:** adopt Title Option A ("Habit Tracker & Daily Routine," 29/30) paired with Subtitle Option A ("Build Routines, Track Streaks," 29/30). Together they place all three of your target keywords across the two fields Apple weights most heavily for search ranking, without exceeding either field's limit.
**Still missing for full optimization:**
- No screenshots were described in the app brief, so the Click stage of the funnel (subtitle + screenshots) is only half-covered — Card 6 can't produce real captions until screenshot content exists.
- Only qualitative volume/competition flags were provided for each keyword (high/medium/low) — no exact search-volume or difficulty numbers. Everything below is prioritized on relevance and placement logic, not invented metrics.
---
### CARD 2 — TITLE & SUBTITLE OPTIONS
**Title (30-char limit):**
| Option | Text | Count |
|---|---|---|
| A (recommended) | Habit Tracker & Daily Routine | 29/30 |
| B | Habit Tracker: Build Streaks | 28/30 |
| C | Daily Habit & Streak Tracker | 28/30 |
**Subtitle (30-char limit):**
| Option | Text | Count |
|---|---|---|
| A (recommended, pairs with Title A) | Build Routines, Track Streaks | 29/30 |
| B | Daily Routine App with Charts | 29/30 |
| C (feature-forward, not keyword-dense) | Reminders & Progress Charts | 27/30 |
---
### CARD 3 — KEYWORD FIELD PLAN
| Keyword | Priority | Placement |
|---|---|---|
| habit tracker | High (user-flagged high volume, high competition) | Title |
| daily routine app | Medium (user-flagged medium volume/competition) | Title (partial: "Daily Routine") + Subtitle (partial: "Routines") |
| streak tracker | Low–Medium (user-flagged lower volume/competition, easier win) | Subtitle (partial: "Track... Streaks") + Keyword field |
**On the near-synonym overlap (Rule 8):** all three target terms cluster around the same underlying concept — building and maintaining consistency — so they're deliberately spread across different fields rather than stacked together in one, to avoid wasting character budget on repeated intent. "habit tracker" anchors the Title (heaviest ranking weight), "daily routine app" shares the Title/Subtitle boundary, and "streak tracker" is captured through word-level matches in the Subtitle plus reinforcement in the Keyword field. Apple matches individual words across Title + Subtitle + Keyword field to construct multi-word queries, so exact phrase order isn't required.
**Keyword field (100-char limit)** — deliberately excludes words already used in Title/Subtitle ("habit," "tracker," "daily," "routine," "streak(s)," "track") since those are already indexed there:
```
consistency,goal,reminder,chart,progress,exercise,reading,meditation,builder,checklist
```
86/100 (14 characters of buffer remaining for future testing).
**Suggested additions (not in your original target list, surfaced per Rule 7):** "reminders" and "progress chart" both appear directly in your app description but weren't among the three target keywords. They're reflected above as single-word variants ("reminder," "chart," "progress") rather than added as formal target keywords — treat them as candidates to test as full phrases if a future round shows appetite.
---
### CARD 4 — KEYWORD DIAGNOSTIC
| Factor | Score | Status | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance to App | STRONG | PROVIDED | All three target keywords map directly to stated features — habit tracking, daily-routine building, and streak tracking are explicitly described in the app brief. No keyword requires stretching the app's actual function. |
| Placement Priority | STRONG | PROVIDED | Priority ordering follows the volume/competition notes you supplied: the high-volume/high-competition term anchors the Title (heaviest weight), the medium term shares Title/Subtitle, and the lower-volume/lower-competition term — the easier near-term win — fills out the Subtitle and Keyword field. |
| Character Budget Fit | STRONG | PROVIDED | Recommended Title (29/30) and Subtitle (29/30) fit within Apple's 30-character limits with a 1-character margin each; Keyword field draft is 86/100, leaving room to test additions. |
| Keyword Cannibalization Risk `(OPERATIONAL EXTENSION — NOT A GUARANTEED PLATFORM ALGORITHM EFFECT)` | MODERATE | SUGGESTED | All three keywords sit close together semantically (habit tracker ↔ streak tracker especially, since streak tracking is typically a feature within habit tracking). This is addressed by spreading them across Title/Subtitle/Keyword field rather than concentrating them in one, but the underlying conceptual overlap isn't something field placement can fully remove — treat this as a planning caution, not a confirmed Apple Search ranking penalty. |
**Core Keyword Reading:** the plan leans on relevance and placement logic rather than search-volume math, since no exact numbers were provided — only your qualitative flags. Given those flags, "habit tracker" is worth the Title real estate despite the competition, because it's the highest-ceiling term; "daily routine app" is a reasonable secondary bet at medium competition; "streak tracker" is the most realistic near-term ranking opportunity given its lower competition, which is why it's reinforced in two fields (Subtitle + Keyword field) rather than one.
---
### CARD 5 — LONG DESCRIPTION DRAFT
573/4,000 characters (well under the limit — room to expand with more detail if you want a longer draft).
```
Build habits that actually stick.
{App Name} helps you turn daily intentions into lasting routines. Whether you're working on exercise, reading, or meditation, simple daily tracking keeps you consistent without the clutter.
WHAT YOU GET
- Habit tracking built around your own daily routine
- Streak tracking that keeps you motivated day after day
- Reminders so a busy day never becomes a missed one
- Simple progress charts that show your consistency at a glance
{Insert app rating and review count here once available}
Start today - your first streak is one tap away.
```
Note on fidelity: reminders and progress charts are each mentioned only briefly in the app brief, so they stay as one-line claims here rather than being expanded into unstated specifics (e.g., no claims about customizable reminder schedules or chart types, since those weren't described).
---
### CARD 6 — SCREENSHOT CAPTION SUGGESTIONS
No screenshots were described in the app brief, so captions can't be written against real screenshot content yet.
*(SUGGESTED, optional)* If you're designing screenshots next, the four stated features give you a natural four-screen sequence to caption once the visuals exist: habit tracking → streak tracking → reminders → progress charts. Send over the actual screenshot descriptions (or drafts) when ready and this card can be filled in properly.
---
### CARD 7 — COMPETITIVE DIFFERENTIATION NOTE
Habitica differentiates on gamification and RPG framing; Streaks differentiates on minimalism, anchored by a hard 6-task cap. Neither of those claims transfers to this app — nothing in the brief describes gamification, RPG elements, or a fixed task limit here.
What this app's own stated facts support as a genuine position: a straightforward combination of streak tracking, reminders, and simple visual progress charts — a middle ground between "gamified system" and "stripped-down minimalism," built around seeing your consistency at a glance rather than either earning in-game rewards or working within an artificial cap. That's a real distinction grounded in what the app actually does, not a copy of either competitor's language.
---
### CARD 8 — A/B TEST PLAN
**Test first:** Title Option A ("Habit Tracker & Daily Routine") vs. Title Option C ("Daily Habit & Streak Tracker"), holding the Subtitle constant. This isolates whether leading with "habit tracker" or leading with a blended "daily habit/streak" framing pulls more taps from the same search impressions.
**Metric that defines a win:** product page conversion rate (installs ÷ product page views) in App Store Connect, measured over a comparable traffic window for each variant. Track keyword ranking movement for all three target terms as a secondary signal, not the primary success metric, since ranking is influenced by more than title/subtitle copy alone.
---
### CARD 9 — METHOD NOTE
This document is a copy-optimization aid, not a ranking guarantee — nothing here can promise where the app will actually land in App Store search results. The analysis is organized around the ASO Conversion Funnel (Impression → Click → Install), with every copy element mapped to one stage of that funnel, and it layers in one additional planning concept, Keyword Cannibalization Risk, which is explicitly an operational heuristic about character-budget and semantic overlap rather than a confirmed effect of Apple's actual search algorithm. The two competitor listings supplied (Habitica, Streaks) were used only to identify what this app's positioning is *not* copying — their specific claims (gamification, the 6-task cap) were never treated as true of this app. Because only qualitative volume/competition flags were given for each keyword, and no screenshots were described, real keyword performance and click-through behavior should be monitored post-launch in App Store Connect and this plan iterated on once that data exists.
---
**VERDICT: NEEDS SCREENSHOT DESCRIPTIONS — the title/subtitle/keyword-field plan is ready to submit, but the Click stage of the funnel can't be fully optimized until actual screenshot content is described so Card 6's captions can be written against it.**
Get this prompt + 9 more with Select$14 your first month, then $19/mo$14 first month, then $19/mo
View SelectBy purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-OPUS
📱 Give it your app facts, target keywords, and platform (iOS/Google Play) to get a 9-card ASO package: title/subtitle variants with exact character counts, a keyword placement plan, a full long description draft, and a keyword-cannibalization risk map for near-synonym keywords competing for the same character budget. Never invents search-volume or ranking data, and never lets a one-line feature balloon into an unsupported marketing claim. Submission-ready copy, grounded in your real facts. 🚀
...more
Added over 1 month ago
