Prompt Details
Model
(claude-5-5-sonnet)
Token size
874
Example input
[SELLER_OFFER]: FuelLoop: software that matches fuel-card transactions to routes automatically and flags what does not fit
[PROSPECT_PROFILE]: VP of Operations at US Midwest regional trucking carriers, 50-300 trucks
[TRIGGER_SIGNAL]: Opened a new terminal in Indianapolis last month
[PROOF_POINT]: Hartwell Freight (120 trucks) cut weekly fuel reconciliation from 9 hours to 2 and found 3.1% of monthly fuel spend was unmatched in the first 60 days
[VOICE_AND_LANGUAGE]: English, plain and direct, like one operator talking to another
Example output
A. ANGLE BRIEF
Priority: keep cost per mile flat while adding a terminal. Trigger: a new terminal means more trucks, more fuel cards and more transactions nobody reviews line by line (assumption). Cost of inaction: leakage grows quietly with fleet size (assumption). Promise: fuel reconciliation in 2 hours a week instead of 9. Why now: the Indianapolis cards are being set up now, so controls are cheapest before habits form (assumption).
B. SEQUENCE
EMAIL 1 | Day 1 | CTA level 1: interest question
Subject A: indianapolis fuel cards
Subject B: new terminal, fuel spend
Hi {First Name},
Your Indianapolis terminal opened last month. {Specific detail}
A new terminal brings a new batch of fuel cards, and nobody has time to match every swipe to a route. That gap is where fuel money leaks.
FuelLoop matches card transactions to routes automatically and flags what does not fit. Hartwell Freight (120 trucks) went from 9 hours of weekly reconciliation to 2.
Would that be worth a look before Indianapolis ramps up?
{Sender Name}
EMAIL 2 | Day 4 | same thread as email 1 | CTA level 2: asset for a reply
Hi {First Name},
One more thing on fuel controls at a new terminal. When fuel is reviewed only by sampling, a card used off-route can sit unnoticed for weeks.
I have a one-page checklist of the fuel-card checks worth running whenever a carrier adds a terminal. Reply "checklist" and I will send it over.
{Sender Name}
EMAIL 3 | Day 9 | new thread | CTA level 3: 15-minute call
Subject A: 9 hours to 2
Subject B: how hartwell cut fuel admin
Hi {First Name},
Hartwell Freight runs 120 trucks. Reconciling their fuel cards took 9 hours every week.
Today FuelLoop matches each transaction to a route and flags the ones that do not fit. Weekly reconciliation is down to 2 hours, and in the first 60 days they found 3.1% of monthly fuel spend was unmatched.
Could we take 15 minutes Tuesday morning or Thursday afternoon to see what your Indianapolis cards would show?
{Sender Name}
EMAIL 4 | Day 16 | same thread as email 3 | CTA level 4: referral ask
Hi {First Name},
I will stop writing after this one. If fuel controls for Indianapolis are not on your list this year, no problem.
If someone else owns fuel cards or fleet cost, who should I talk to?
{Sender Name}
C. CADENCE NOTES (defaults to test, not guarantees)
- Send Tuesday to Thursday mornings in the prospect's time zone; compare against your own data after 100 sends.
- Stop the sequence the moment anyone replies, including an out-of-office from a human.
- Plain text only; warm up any new sending domain before this goes out.
Check: E1 72 / E2 51 / E3 70 / E4 35 words | banned words 0 | invented facts 0
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-5-SONNET
Expert 4-email B2B cold sequence, built on a research-to-angle method. Give your offer, prospect, trigger signal, proof and voice. Claude picks one angle, opens email 1 on the trigger, and delivers A/B subject lines, a day-by-day cadence, a 4-step CTA ladder (interest, asset, call, referral), word-count, spam-word and plain-text rules, and a built-in self-check. No invented stats. Any language. Fits any outreach tool.
...more
Added 3 days ago
