PromptBase
Close icon
Explore
Marketing & BusinessDown chevron icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Apps
Create
Login
Sell
🤖 GPT

Beat Gpt Zero

Beat Gpt Zero gpt prompt mini thumbnail
2Heart icon
Favorites
59Eye icon
Views
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
Dodge AI detection with ChatGPT, your expert in recrafting AI-generated text into human-like prose. Whether it's for storytelling, articles, or dialogues, ChatGPT is skilled in reshaping text to evade detection by tools like GPT Zero, which are designed to spot artificial language generation. 📚 AI Text Recrafted, Human Touch Retained 📚 ChatGPT excels in: Undetectable Text Recrafting Tone and Style Maintenance Coherent & Contextual Consistency
...more
$3.99
Get prompt
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
1 year ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-4 (gpt-4)
Token size
111 ($0.00330 / call)
Example input
**95% Probablity of AI - GPT ZERO President Harry S. Truman faced one of the most pivotal decisions in history when he authorized the use of atomic bombs against Japan in August 1945. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki marked a turning point in warfare and had profound consequences for humanity. Evaluating the rightness of Truman's decision is a complex and contentious matter, as it involves examining the moral, military, and geopolitical considerations of the time. From a military perspective, Truman's decision could be viewed as justifiable. The bombings hastened the end of World War II and prevented a costly invasion of Japan, which would have undoubtedly resulted in enormous casualties on both sides. The atomic bombs, with their unprecedented destructive power, presented a clear message of overwhelming force to the Japanese government, compelling them to surrender. By avoiding a prolonged conflict, Truman arguably saved lives in the long run. However, the moral implications of Truman's decision cannot be overlooked. The atomic bombings caused immense human suffering and loss of innocent lives. The immediate and long-term effects of the bombings, including radiation sickness and cancer, inflicted severe physical and psychological trauma on the survivors, commonly known as hibakusha. Many argue that Truman's decision violated the principles of just war theory, which emphasize the protection of non-combatants and the proportionality of force. The use of atomic bombs against densely populated civilian centers raises ethical questions that still resonate today. Furthermore, the geopolitical context surrounding Truman's decision is crucial to understanding its complexity. At the time, the United States faced the challenge of the Soviet Union's expanding influence and the emerging Cold War. Some argue that the bombings served as a demonstration of American military might and aimed to deter Soviet aggression. By displaying the overwhelming power of the atomic bomb, Truman sought to shape the post-war world order and ensure American dominance. While this geopolitical perspective may provide a rationale for Truman's decision, it does not fully address the ethical considerations. In evaluating Truman's decision, it is essential to recognize the limited options available to him. The alternative to the atomic bombings would have been a full-scale invasion of Japan, which military planners estimated could result in hundreds of thousands of casualties. The firebombing campaigns carried out by the Allies had already caused widespread destruction and loss of life in Japanese cities. Truman faced a difficult moral calculus in which he had to weigh the immediate devastation caused by the atomic bombs against the potential human cost of a prolonged war. Ultimately, whether Truman made the right decision to drop the atom bomb is a matter of perspective and remains the subject of intense debate. The use of atomic weapons was a watershed moment in human history, leading to the reevaluation of warfare and the arms race that followed. Truman's decision may have brought a swift end to the war, but it also unleashed the specter of nuclear weapons that continues to shape global politics and security concerns to this day.
Example output
**0% Probablity of AI - GPT ZERO The Second World War, frequently recognized as the most devastating conflict ever witnessed by humanity, began its reign of terror in 1939, lasting until 1945. It sprang from a tangled web of factors, including escalating tensions, political aspirations, territorial disagreements, and unresolved issues that were leftover remnants from the First World War. Although the causes of this global catastrophe are intricate and interconnected, certain pivotal circumstances and events undoubtedly acted as catalysts that sparked the horrific World War II. A key catalyst for the Second World War was the ineptitude of the global community to confront and neutralize the territorial aggrandizement pursued by totalitarian regimes across Europe and Asia. With the ascendance of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany, their desire for territorial expansion transgressed the Treaty of Versailles, a treaty designed to safeguard peace following the First World War. Hitler's belligerent moves, such as the annexation of Austria and the encroachment on Czechoslovakia, made his expansionist desires and contempt for international principles evident. Meanwhile, in Asia, Imperial Japan was treading a path marked by militarization and territorial expansion, with ambitions to assert its supremacy in the region. The invasion of Manchuria by Japan in 1931, followed by subsequent military incursions into China, seriously upset the global equilibrium. Coupled with Japan's departure from the League of Nations in 1933, this spurred an atmosphere of unease and heightened international divisions. Another significant factor contributing to the eruption of World War II was the collapse of appeasement policies. Hoping to evade conflict, Western democracies such as Britain and France adopted a policy of appeasement toward Hitler's Germany. This policy involved granting concessions to Hitler, including permitting the annexation of Czechoslovakia, in the hope of averting further hostility. However, Hitler's voracious thirst for power was never satiated, and this policy of appeasement only served to embolden him to engage in even more forceful actions. The war was set in motion in September 1939 when Germany made a brazen assault on Poland. This hostile act led Britain and France to declare war on Germany. The conflict escalated rapidly as Germany unleashed its blitzkrieg strategies, rapidly overpowering vast European territories. The war's reach extended as the Axis Powers—Germany, Italy, and Japan—formed alliances and launched military campaigns worldwide. In summary, World War II was born out of a variety of factors, including the territorial ambitions of Germany and Japan, the impotence of international diplomacy to curb such aggressions, and the inability to redress the unresolved issues from World War I. The lack of effective dispute resolution mechanisms and the collapse of appeasement policies ultimately culminated in a global conflict. The insights gleaned from the causes of World War II underscore the significance of international collaboration, diplomacy, and the pursuit of enduring peace to forestall such calamitous events in the future.
Browse Marketplace