Prompt Details
Model
Chat - (gpt-5.4)
Token size
370
Example input
[WHAT YOU SELL]: Landing page copywriting for SaaS companies
[WHO THE CLIENT IS]: SaaS founder
[WHAT THEY ARE ASKING YOU TO DO FOR FREE]: They want me to write the hero section and first two sections of the landing page for free so they can “see if we are a fit”
[WHAT HAS HAPPENED SO FAR]: We had one call, they liked my portfolio, and I already explained my process. They said they are comparing a few copywriters and want a quick free sample before deciding.
[SET BOUNDARY / OFFER PAID OPTION / QUALIFY / WALK AWAY]: Set Boundary
Example output
Situation Summary
A SaaS founder is asking you to write the hero + first two sections of a landing page for free after already reviewing your portfolio and process. They justify it as a “fit test” while comparing multiple copywriters.
Step 1: Request Analysis
What they’re asking for:
Not a small sample — this is core, high-impact copy
Requires thinking, positioning, and real work (not a trivial task)
Type of request:
This is not a standard evaluation request
It is a boundary-risk request disguised as a fit test
A normal evaluation would be:
Reviewing portfolio
Paid test
Strategy call
Small paid audit
Step 2: Risk Detection
Red flags present:
Asking for production-level work for free
Comparing multiple providers → likely repeating this request across candidates
Already saw your portfolio → still wants more proof
“Quick sample” framing minimizes real effort required
Interpretation:
Low commitment
Low trust OR decision paralysis
Possible pattern of extracting free work
Red Flag Score: 8/10
Step 3: Positioning Impact
If you say yes:
You devalue your expertise (especially in SaaS copy, where strategy matters)
You train the client to expect free iterations
You weaken pricing power later (“you already did part of it”)
You become interchangeable with other writers
Precedent risk:
High — this sets a free work → paid work funnel
Future scope creep becomes more likely
Step 4: Response Strategy
Best path:
Decline unpaid work
Reframe to paid test OR alternative proof
Maintain calm, professional authority
Options:
Primary: Offer a paid test project (credited if hired)
Secondary: Redirect to portfolio + case studies
Tertiary: Offer a paid audit/strategy session instead
Tone:
Calm, confident, non-defensive
No over-explaining
No apologizing for boundaries
Step 5: Boundary Message
Message To Send (Recommended)
I understand wanting to make the right choice, especially when comparing options.
For work like this, I don’t provide unpaid sample copy, since the hero and opening sections are typically the most strategic and high-impact parts of the page.
What I can offer instead is a paid test project where I write those sections for you. If we move forward, I’ll credit that toward the full project.
Alternatively, I’m happy to walk you through relevant case studies and explain how I’d approach your page so you can evaluate fit without needing spec work.
Alternative Responses
Softer Version
That makes sense — choosing the right copywriter is important.
I don’t usually do unpaid sample work, mainly because the sections you mentioned involve a fair amount of strategy and research.
If helpful, we could do a small paid test for those sections, or I can share a few examples and walk you through how I’d approach your landing page specifically.
Firmer Version
I don’t provide unpaid sample work, especially for core landing page sections like the hero and opening blocks.
If you'd like to test working together, we can do a paid trial project, or you can evaluate fit based on my portfolio and process.
Let me know how you’d like to proceed.
Main Risk
Doing meaningful strategic work for free and attracting low-commitment clients who optimize for extraction, not outcomes.
Mistakes To Avoid
Agreeing “just this once”
Offering a reduced/free “mini version” (still unpaid labor)
Over-justifying your boundary (signals insecurity)
Getting pulled into negotiation around free work
Writing partial copy “to show goodwill”
Next-Step Recommendations
Send the primary response
If they push back:
Repeat boundary once (do not negotiate downward)
If they agree to paid test:
Define clear scope, price, and credit toward full project
If they disappear:
Disqualify and move on (good filter)
Bottom line:
This is a high-risk, low-quality signal client behavior. The correct move is to protect positioning and convert to paid validation or walk away.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.4
A prospect wants a free sample, unpaid trial, or “small test” before hiring you. This prompt analyzes whether the request is a red flag, how much risk it creates, and the best way to respond without sounding defensive or losing control. Use it to protect your time, hold your position, and decide whether to set boundaries, offer a paid alternative, or walk away.
...more
Added 1 week ago
