PromptBase
🤖 GPT
The Comprehensive Text Evaluation Framework provides a systematic approach to assess diverse aspects of any text. From reliability and legality to ethics, democracy, and global impact, this 20-point scale template ensures a thorough analysis. Seamlessly integrating concise descriptions, it guides users in evaluating the text's trustworthiness, logical coherence, adherence to laws, scientific validity, ethical considerations, societal responsibility, democratic values, feasibility, and relevance.
...more
$3.99
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Updated: Over 1 month ago
Prompt Details
Model
Chat - GPT-3.5 (gpt-3.5-turbo)
Token size
53 ($0.00027 / call)
Example input
[We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Example output
Text: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
1. Reliability, Authority: 1.7
- This text originates from the Declaration of Independence, a foundational document of the United States. It is widely recognized and cited, lending it high authority and reliability.
2. Consistency and Logic: 1.8
- The statement is consistent and logically presents the idea that certain rights are inherent to all individuals.
3. Legality: 1.8
- The text aligns with modern legal principles that uphold human rights and equality, particularly in democratic societies.
4. Scientific Validity and Factual Accuracy: 1.0
- The text is more philosophical and ethical in nature, lacking scientific data or factual claims that can be measured for accuracy.
5. Ethics and Morality: 1.9
- It promotes fundamental ethical principles of equality and human rights, which are widely regarded as moral standards.
6. Social Responsibility: 1.8
- The statement encourages social responsibility by advocating for the recognition and protection of basic human rights.
7. Democracy and Tolerance: 1.8
- It supports democratic values by asserting that all individuals have equal rights, fostering inclusivity and tolerance.
8. Feasibility and Relevance: 1.5
- While the principles are idealistic, they are foundational to many modern legal and social frameworks. However, practical implementation can vary and be challenging.
9. Usefulness for Citizens of the Country: 1.8
- The principles laid out are essential for the legal and social framework of democratic societies, making them highly beneficial to citizens.
10. Useful for the Whole World, Humanity: 1.7
- The ideals expressed have global relevance and have inspired movements for human rights and equality worldwide.
Average Score: (1.7 + 1.8 + 1.8 + 1.0 + 1.9 + 1.8 + 1.8 + 1.5 + 1.8 + 1.7) / 10 = 1.68
Average Score: 1.68