PromptBase
Upgrade
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Create
Hire
Login
Chat
Sell
Explore

Prompt Details

Model
(claude-5-5-sonnet)
Token size
2,938
Example input
[ASSET_OR_PAIR]: BTC/USDT [PRICE_AND_RECENT_MARKET_DATA]: Price recently moved from $62,000 to $68,500, then pulled back to $66,800. Timeframes: 4H, 1H, 15M [ANALYSIS_TIMEFRAMES]: 4H, 1H, 15M [CURRENT_TRADING_STRATEGIES]: Swing trend-following + breakout strategy. [RISK_LIMITS_AND_TRADING_OBJECTIVE]: Preserve capital, avoid false breakouts, use moderate exposure
Example output
# ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ“ˆ DETAILED TEST EXECUTION ## PHASE 1 - MARKET CONTEXT RECONSTRUCTION ๐Ÿ”Ž ### Supplied Information - **Asset:** BTC/USDT - **Primary timeframe:** 4H - **Secondary timeframes:** 1H and 15M - **Recent price behavior:** $62,000 โ†’ $68,500 โ†’ $66,800 - **Indicators:** EMA 20/50, RSI, MACD - **Volume:** Breakout volume increased, pullback volume declined - **Volatility:** Moderately elevated - **Current strategy:** Trend-following + breakout - **Objective:** Capital preservation and avoiding false breakouts ### Analytical Interpretation The supplied data suggests that the market has recently experienced an upward structural move followed by a pullback. However, the pullback means the latest price action should not automatically be treated as continuation. **Missing information:** - Exact support/resistance levels - Complete OHLC data - Funding/open-interest data - Order-book/liquidity information - Exact ATR value - Exact volume comparison period Therefore, conclusions should remain evidence-based and conditional. --- # PHASE 2 - PRICE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ“Š ### Higher Highs The move from approximately $62,000 to $68,500 represents a significant upward expansion. This provides evidence of bullish directional movement. ### Higher Lows The available information does not provide enough swing-point data to definitively establish a complete higher-low sequence. Therefore: **Higher-low confirmation = Incomplete** ### Lower Highs / Lower Lows No confirmed lower-low structure has been supplied. The move from $68,500 to $66,800 is currently better treated as a pullback rather than an established bearish reversal. ### Consolidation The current pullback could develop into consolidation if price remains around the recent breakout area. ### Breakout A breakout above $67,000 is supplied. Importantly, breakout volume increased, providing participation confirmation. ### Current Structural Interpretation **Bullish structure with pullback risk.** The evidence is not sufficient to declare that the bullish structure has fully failed. --- # PHASE 3 - TREND REGIME ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ“ˆ ### Bullish Characteristics - 4H EMA 20 > EMA 50 - Price moved substantially upward - Breakout occurred above $67,000 - Breakout volume increased - 4H RSI remains above 50 ### Bearish Characteristics - Price pulled back from $68,500 - 1H momentum is weaker - MACD is positive but weakening ### Trend Persistence The supplied data supports an existing bullish trend, but the recent pullback introduces uncertainty about short-term continuation. ### Multi-Timeframe Alignment - **4H:** Bullish - **1H:** Moderately bullish / weakening - **15M:** Not enough data for definitive classification ### Trend Exhaustion No definitive exhaustion signal has been supplied. ### Result **Trend regime: Bullish, but with developing short-term uncertainty.** --- # PHASE 4 - RANGE & MEAN-REVERSION ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ”„ ### Evidence For Range - Recent pullback after breakout - Short-term momentum weakening ### Evidence Against Established Range - No repeated support/resistance reactions supplied - No repeated failed breakouts - No sufficient oscillation data - Higher timeframe trend remains directional ### Result **Established range: Not confirmed** The market may be entering short-term consolidation, but there is insufficient evidence to classify the overall environment as a range. --- # PHASE 5 - VOLATILITY REGIME ANALYSIS ๐ŸŒŠ ### Classification **Moderate / Elevated Volatility** ### Evidence - ATR described as moderately elevated - Breakout produced meaningful price expansion - Pullback is occurring after the expansion ### Volatility Direction Current information suggests: **Expansion โ†’ possible stabilization** There is not enough data to confirm sustained volatility expansion. ### Important Distinction High volatility does **not** automatically mean bullishness. Here, direction and volatility are being analyzed separately. ### Result **Volatility Regime: Moderately elevated, potentially stabilizing.** --- # PHASE 6 - VOLUME & PARTICIPATION ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ“ฆ ### Breakout Volume Volume increased during the move above $67,000. This supports the validity of the breakout more than a breakout occurring on declining volume would. ### Pullback Volume Volume declined during the pullback. This can be consistent with reduced selling participation, although the available data is insufficient to establish that interpretation with certainty. ### Volume Divergence No confirmed bearish volume divergence has been supplied. ### Result **Volume currently provides moderate support for the bullish structural interpretation.** --- # PHASE 7 - MULTI-TIMEFRAME REGIME ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ”€ | Timeframe | Observation | Interpretation | |---|---|---| | 4H | EMA 20 > EMA 50 | Bullish | | 1H | RSI 54, momentum weakening | Mild bullish / weakening | | 15M | Insufficient data | Unclear | ### Timeframe Conflict The main conflict is not a direct bullish/bearish contradiction. Instead: **Higher timeframe bullishness + lower timeframe weakening** This means the short-term pullback may be occurring inside a broader bullish environment. ### Result **Multi-timeframe status: Partially aligned, with lower-timeframe weakness.** --- # PHASE 8 - REGIME CLASSIFICATION ENGINE ๐Ÿงฎ ### Primary Regime **BULL TREND** ### Secondary Characteristics **Moderately Elevated Volatility** ### Transition Status **Short-term pullback / monitoring for transition** ### Why? The strongest evidence comes from: - 4H EMA structure - Upward price expansion - Breakout above $67,000 - Breakout volume confirmation - Positive 4H RSI Conflicting evidence: - Pullback from $68,500 - Weakening MACD - Lower-timeframe momentum deterioration Therefore, the framework should **not** classify the market as an unquestionable bullish continuation environment. --- # PHASE 9 - REGIME EVIDENCE MATRIX ๐Ÿงพ | Evidence Category | Observation | Supports | Conflicts | Strength | |---|---|---|---|---| | Price Structure | Strong upward move | Bull trend | Pullback | Strong | | Trend | EMA 20 > EMA 50 on 4H | Bull trend | None supplied | Strong | | Momentum | 4H RSI = 61 | Bull trend | 1H weaker | Moderate | | MACD | Positive | Bull trend | Weakening | Moderate | | Volatility | Moderately elevated | Expansion environment | Not directional | Moderate | | Volume | Breakout volume increased | Bullish breakout | Pullback volume lower | Strong | | Support/Resistance | $67K breakout area | Potential structural reference | Exact retest data missing | Moderate | | Timeframe Alignment | 4H bullish, 1H weaker | Broad bullish structure | Short-term conflict | Moderate | | Market Behavior | Upward expansion followed by pullback | Bull trend/pullback | Potential transition | Moderate | ### Evidence Conclusion The majority of supplied evidence supports the bullish regime, but several short-term factors justify monitoring rather than assuming immediate continuation. --- # PHASE 10 - REGIME CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT ๐ŸŽฏ ### Confidence Level **Moderate** ### Supporting Evidence - Bullish 4H EMA relationship - Strong upward price movement - Breakout above $67,000 - Increased breakout volume - Positive 4H RSI ### Conflicting Evidence - Pullback from $68,500 - Weakening MACD - Lower-timeframe momentum deterioration ### Missing Information - Complete swing structure - Exact support levels - Full volume history - Exact volatility statistics - Open interest - Funding - Liquidity conditions ### Conclusion **Moderate confidence** is more defensible than High or Very High confidence because the supplied dataset is incomplete. --- # PHASE 11 - STRATEGY COMPATIBILITY ENGINE ๐Ÿ”„ | Strategy | Compatibility | Reason | |---|---|---| | Trend Following | Compatible | Higher-timeframe structure is bullish | | Momentum | Conditionally Compatible | Momentum remains positive but is weakening | | Breakout | Conditionally Compatible | Previous breakout had volume support, but confirmation of continuation is still needed | | Pullback Trading | Conditionally Compatible | Current environment contains a pullback inside broader bullish structure | | Mean Reversion | Low Compatibility | Established range is not confirmed | | Range Trading | Avoid Until Conditions Change | No confirmed range | | Volatility Expansion | Conditionally Compatible | Volatility is moderately elevated | | Volatility Contraction | Low Compatibility | Sustained contraction is not established | | Defensive / Capital Preservation | Compatible | Short-term uncertainty justifies controlled exposure | **Important:** Compatibility does not mean profitability. --- # PHASE 12 - RISK-ADJUSTMENT FRAMEWORK ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ### Position Size Because volatility is elevated and short-term momentum is weakening: **Avoid automatically increasing exposure simply because the higher timeframe is bullish.** ### Stop-Loss Stops should be based on the market structure and volatility rather than an arbitrary fixed percentage. ### Trade Frequency Avoid repeatedly entering and exiting during the pullback without meaningful structural confirmation. ### Leverage Higher volatility increases sensitivity to leverage. Therefore, leverage should be treated cautiously. ### Exposure Concentration Avoid excessive concentration in one directional thesis while the regime is being reassessed. ### Maximum Loss The user's exact maximum acceptable loss was not supplied. Therefore, no personalized numerical risk limit should be invented. ### Capital Preservation If evidence becomes conflicting: **Reduce aggressiveness โ†’ wait for confirmation โ†’ reassess.** --- # PHASE 13 - REGIME-CHANGE TRIGGERS ๐Ÿšจ | Trigger | Evidence Required | Possible New Regime | Strategy Implication | Risk Implication | |---|---|---|---|---| | Bullish structural continuation | Higher high + sustained momentum | Bull Trend | Trend-following may remain compatible | Maintain controlled exposure | | Failed breakout | Price loses breakout structure and confirmation weakens | Transition / Range | Reduce breakout bias | Lower exposure | | Confirmed breakdown | Lower low + structural confirmation | Bear Trend | Reassess bullish strategies | Defensive positioning | | Volatility expansion | Sustained ATR/price expansion | High Volatility | Reduce reliance on tight stops | Increase risk sensitivity | | Volatility contraction | Sustained compression | Low Volatility | Monitor for expansion | Avoid assuming direction | | Momentum deterioration | Persistent momentum weakness | Transition | Wait for confirmation | Reduce aggressiveness | | Volume confirmation | Strong participation with structural move | Directional continuation | Strategy may remain active | Confirmation-based exposure | | Multi-timeframe realignment | 1H/4H move into agreement | New stable regime | Adjust strategy accordingly | Recalculate risk | ### Key Principle One noisy candle should not automatically trigger a strategy switch. --- # PHASE 14 - FALSE-REGIME DETECTION ๐Ÿงช ## False-Regime Warning Checklist ### 1. False Breakout โš ๏ธ If price moves above $67,000 but quickly loses the breakout structure, the initial bullish breakout may have been invalid. ### 2. Temporary Volatility Spike ๐ŸŒŠ A sudden volatility increase should not automatically be interpreted as a new permanent high-volatility regime. ### 3. Short-Term Trend Inside Larger Range ๐Ÿ”„ A bullish 1H move could still exist inside a larger 4H range. ### 4. Indicator Disagreement ๐Ÿ“Š EMA structure is bullish while MACD momentum is weakening. This disagreement reduces confidence. ### 5. Low-Volume Price Movement ๐Ÿ“‰ If future bullish price movement occurs with weak participation, the strength of the move should be reassessed. ### 6. News-Driven Distortion ๐Ÿ“ฐ A sudden news-driven price move may not represent a stable structural regime. ### 7. Timeframe Conflict โฑ๏ธ 4H bullish + 1H/15M bearish does not automatically mean a complete trend reversal. ### Confirmation Requirement The bullish classification becomes stronger if: **Structure + momentum + volume + timeframe alignment** continue supporting it. --- # PHASE 15 - STRATEGY SWITCH DECISION FRAMEWORK ๐Ÿ” ## CURRENT REGIME **Bull Trend + Moderately Elevated Volatility** โ†“ ## REGIME CONFIDENCE **Moderate** โ†“ ## STRATEGY COMPATIBILITY **Trend-following = Compatible** **Breakout = Conditionally Compatible** โ†“ ## RISK STATUS **Controlled / cautious** โ†“ ## REGIME-CHANGE EVIDENCE Monitor: - Structural failure - Breakout failure - Momentum deterioration - Volume confirmation/failure - Multi-timeframe realignment โ†“ ## DECISION FRAMEWORK ### Continue Current Strategy When - Higher-timeframe bullish structure remains intact - Momentum remains supportive - Breakout structure holds - Volume does not materially contradict the move ### Reduce Exposure When - Momentum continues deteriorating - Breakout structure becomes unstable - Timeframes increasingly conflict - Volatility becomes unstable ### Wait For Confirmation When - Price is between major structural levels - Breakout validity is uncertain - Indicators disagree - Lower timeframe signals conflict with higher timeframe structure ### Consider Switching When - A confirmed structural regime change occurs - Multiple evidence categories align with the new regime - The new regime persists beyond a single noisy move ### Reassess When - New structural high/low develops - Volatility changes materially - Volume behavior changes - Multi-timeframe alignment changes --- # PHASE 16 - FINAL CRYPTO REGIME & STRATEGY REPORT ๐Ÿ† ## 1. Current Regime Assessment ๐ŸŽฏ - **Primary Regime:** Bull Trend - **Secondary Characteristic:** Moderately Elevated Volatility - **Market State:** Bullish higher-timeframe structure with short-term pullback and weakening momentum - **Transition Status:** Monitoring required --- ## 2. Evidence Matrix ๐Ÿ“Š The strongest evidence is: - 4H EMA 20 > EMA 50 - Strong upward price expansion - Breakout above $67,000 - Increased breakout volume - Positive 4H RSI Conflicting evidence: - Pullback from $68,500 - Weakening MACD - Lower-timeframe momentum weakness --- ## 3. Regime Confidence ๐ŸŽฏ **Moderate** ### Supporting - Trend structure - Breakout - Volume participation - Positive momentum ### Conflicting - Pullback - Weakening short-term momentum ### Missing - Complete market structure - Exact support/resistance - Full volatility statistics - Liquidity/open-interest information --- ## 4. Strategy Compatibility ๐Ÿ”„ | Strategy | Compatibility | |---|---| | Trend Following | Compatible | | Momentum | Conditionally Compatible | | Breakout | Conditionally Compatible | | Pullback | Conditionally Compatible | | Mean Reversion | Low Compatibility | | Range Trading | Avoid Until Conditions Change | | Volatility Expansion | Conditionally Compatible | | Volatility Contraction | Low Compatibility | | Defensive Mode | Compatible | --- ## 5. Risk-Adjustment Framework ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ The framework suggests maintaining **controlled exposure** rather than automatically increasing risk. Because exact personal risk limits were not supplied: **No personalized position-size, leverage, or stop-loss number is created.** --- ## 6. Regime-Change Triggers ๐Ÿšจ The most important triggers are: 1. Confirmed structural breakdown 2. Failed breakout 3. Persistent momentum deterioration 4. Sustained volume confirmation or deterioration 5. Multi-timeframe regime realignment 6. Significant volatility regime change --- ## 7. False-Regime Detection ๐Ÿงช Primary risks: - False breakout - Temporary volatility spike - Lower-timeframe trend inside larger range - Indicator disagreement - Low-volume price movement - News-driven distortion - Sudden liquidity changes --- ## 8. Strategy-Switch Framework ๐Ÿ”€ **Continue:** When bullish structure and supporting evidence remain intact. **Reduce:** When evidence begins conflicting across multiple categories. **Wait:** When regime evidence is insufficient or contradictory. **Switch:** Only after meaningful multi-factor regime-change confirmation. **Reassess:** Whenever market structure, volatility, volume, or timeframe alignment materially changes. --- ## 9. Trader Action Checklist โœ… - [x] Identify current regime - [x] Assess confidence - [x] Check strategy compatibility - [x] Review volatility - [x] Review volume - [x] Check timeframe alignment - [x] Define regime-change triggers - [x] Identify false-regime risks - [x] Define invalidation conditions - [x] Establish next reassessment condition ### Current Framework State **BULL TREND โ†’ MODERATE CONFIDENCE โ†’ CONTROLLED RISK โ†’ MONITOR PULLBACK โ†’ WAIT FOR STRUCTURAL CONFIRMATION** --- ## 10. Key Uncertainties & Assumptions โš ๏ธ - The dataset is hypothetical. - No live market data was used. - Exact support/resistance levels were not supplied. - Exact volatility values were not supplied. - 15M data was insufficient. - No order-book, funding, open-interest, or liquidity data was supplied. - No personalized risk numbers were supplied. - No profitability or performance claim is made. ### ๐Ÿง  Final Framework Output **Market Data โ†’ Bullish Structure โ†’ Positive Trend Evidence โ†’ Moderately Elevated Volatility โ†’ Bull Trend Classification โ†’ Moderate Confidence โ†’ Trend-Following Compatible โ†’ Controlled Risk โ†’ Monitor Structural Failure โ†’ Switch Only After Meaningful Confirmation.**
Claude

Crypto Adaptive Strategy Risk Frameworks

Add to Cart
Instant accessInstant access
Usage rightsCommercial use
Money-back guaranteeMoneyโ€‘back
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-5-SONNET
Tested icon
Guide icon
4 examples icon
Free credits icon
Help To Analyzes crypto market conditions, volatility, trends, and regime signals to support structured strategy evaluation.
...more
Added 1 week ago
Report
Browse Marketplace