PromptBase
Close icon
Explore
Marketing & BusinessDown chevron icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Apps
Create
Hire
Login
Sell
Outlined heart icon
🤖 GPT

Edurubric Builder

Edurubric Builder gpt prompt mini thumbnail
25Eye icon
Views
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
📝✅🎓 Craft a custom rubric for any assignment, from 'Research Papers' on 'Renewable Energy' to other topics. Define performance levels—Excellent to Needs Improvement—across criteria like Content Knowledge, Creativity, and more, with measurable descriptors. Tailor to your class level, assign point values, and ensure alignment with learning outcomes for clear, fair evaluations.
...more
$2.99
Get prompt
Add to cart icon
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Updated: 4 months ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-4 (gpt-4)
Token size
186 ($0.00560 / call)
Example input
[Insert Assignment Type]: Specify the type of assignment you're creating the rubric for, such as 'Research Paper', 'Lab Report', 'Book Review', etc. [Insert Topic]: Indicate the specific topic of the assignment, like 'Renewable Energy', 'World War II', 'Genetic Engineering', etc. [Insert Level]: State the educational level of the students for whom the rubric is intended, such as 'High School Juniors', 'College Freshmen', etc.
Example output
Research Paper Rubric for High School Juniors: Renewable Energy Content Knowledge Excellent (20 points): Provides in-depth understanding, insightfully integrates complex information about renewable energy. Facts are accurate and relevant. Good (15 points): Shows a clear understanding with minor inaccuracies, includes detailed information about renewable energy. Satisfactory (10 points): Demonstrates basic understanding with some important information missing or incorrect. Needs Improvement (5 points): Lacks understanding of the topic, with significant inaccuracies. Application of Skills Excellent (20 points): Skillfully analyzes and synthesizes information; effectively applies concepts to new situations. Good (15 points): Analyzes and synthesizes information with minor errors; applies concepts to new situations correctly. Satisfactory (10 points): Demonstrates basic analysis and synthesis; limited application of concepts. Needs Improvement (5 points): Analysis and application of concepts are flawed or superficial. Creativity and Originality Excellent (20 points): Presents a highly original perspective, with creative insights and conclusions about renewable energy. Good (15 points): Offers some original perspectives, with occasional creative insights. Satisfactory (10 points): Shows limited originality; perspectives are mostly derived from sources. Needs Improvement (5 points): Lacks original thought; relies solely on the ideas of others. Organization Excellent (20 points): Information is presented in a logical, clear, and coherent manner. Transitions are smooth, enhancing readability. Good (15 points): Generally well-organized, but may have one or two minor lapses in clarity or coherence. Satisfactory (10 points): Some disorganization or lack of clarity; transitions may be awkward. Needs Improvement (5 points): Poor organization; ideas are difficult to follow. Presentation Excellent (10 points): Flawless adherence to the appropriate style guide (e.g., APA, MLA). No grammatical or spelling errors. Good (8 points): Minor errors in style or grammar that do not impede understanding. Satisfactory (6 points): A number of errors in style or grammar; some may distract the reader. Needs Improvement (4 points): Multiple errors in style or grammar that significantly distract the reader. Use of Resources Excellent (20 points): Exceptional integration of diverse, credible sources; sources are well-documented. Good (15 points): Effective use of credible sources; sources are documented correctly. Satisfactory (10 points): Adequate use of sources, but may not be well-integrated or documented. Needs Improvement (5 points): Insufficient or inappropriate sources; poor documentation. Engagement Excellent (10 points): Paper demonstrates a strong, engaging voice that captivates the audience. Good (8 points): Engages the audience with a clear voice, though less captivating. Satisfactory (6 points): Voice is present but may not engage or interest the reader. Needs Improvement (4 points): The voice is weak or absent; fails to engage the audience. Total Points: 100
Browse Marketplace