Example input
[Insert Assignment Type]: Specify the type of assignment you're creating the rubric for, such as 'Research Paper', 'Lab Report', 'Book Review', etc.
[Insert Topic]: Indicate the specific topic of the assignment, like 'Renewable Energy', 'World War II', 'Genetic Engineering', etc.
[Insert Level]: State the educational level of the students for whom the rubric is intended, such as 'High School Juniors', 'College Freshmen', etc.
Example output
Research Paper Rubric for High School Juniors: Renewable Energy
Content Knowledge
Excellent (20 points): Provides in-depth understanding, insightfully integrates complex information about renewable energy. Facts are accurate and relevant.
Good (15 points): Shows a clear understanding with minor inaccuracies, includes detailed information about renewable energy.
Satisfactory (10 points): Demonstrates basic understanding with some important information missing or incorrect.
Needs Improvement (5 points): Lacks understanding of the topic, with significant inaccuracies.
Application of Skills
Excellent (20 points): Skillfully analyzes and synthesizes information; effectively applies concepts to new situations.
Good (15 points): Analyzes and synthesizes information with minor errors; applies concepts to new situations correctly.
Satisfactory (10 points): Demonstrates basic analysis and synthesis; limited application of concepts.
Needs Improvement (5 points): Analysis and application of concepts are flawed or superficial.
Creativity and Originality
Excellent (20 points): Presents a highly original perspective, with creative insights and conclusions about renewable energy.
Good (15 points): Offers some original perspectives, with occasional creative insights.
Satisfactory (10 points): Shows limited originality; perspectives are mostly derived from sources.
Needs Improvement (5 points): Lacks original thought; relies solely on the ideas of others.
Organization
Excellent (20 points): Information is presented in a logical, clear, and coherent manner. Transitions are smooth, enhancing readability.
Good (15 points): Generally well-organized, but may have one or two minor lapses in clarity or coherence.
Satisfactory (10 points): Some disorganization or lack of clarity; transitions may be awkward.
Needs Improvement (5 points): Poor organization; ideas are difficult to follow.
Presentation
Excellent (10 points): Flawless adherence to the appropriate style guide (e.g., APA, MLA). No grammatical or spelling errors.
Good (8 points): Minor errors in style or grammar that do not impede understanding.
Satisfactory (6 points): A number of errors in style or grammar; some may distract the reader.
Needs Improvement (4 points): Multiple errors in style or grammar that significantly distract the reader.
Use of Resources
Excellent (20 points): Exceptional integration of diverse, credible sources; sources are well-documented.
Good (15 points): Effective use of credible sources; sources are documented correctly.
Satisfactory (10 points): Adequate use of sources, but may not be well-integrated or documented.
Needs Improvement (5 points): Insufficient or inappropriate sources; poor documentation.
Engagement
Excellent (10 points): Paper demonstrates a strong, engaging voice that captivates the audience.
Good (8 points): Engages the audience with a clear voice, though less captivating.
Satisfactory (6 points): Voice is present but may not engage or interest the reader.
Needs Improvement (4 points): The voice is weak or absent; fails to engage the audience.
Total Points: 100