PromptBase
Upgrade
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Create
Hire
Login
Chat
Sell
Explore

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - (gpt-5.2)
Token size
456
Example input
[SPORT_CONTEXT]: Football, English Premier League [MATCH_DETAILS]: Liverpool vs Man City (Anfield) [MARKET_AND_ODDS]: Liverpool to Win @ 2.80 (1X2 Market) [RISK_PROFILE]: Balanced
Example output
**Role: Senior Sports Data Scientist & Professional Handicapper** **Market Evaluated:** 1X2 – Liverpool to Win @ 2.80 **Risk Profile:** Balanced --- ## 1. Statistical Deep Dive ### Match Context * **Fixture:** Liverpool vs Manchester City * **Venue:** Anfield (strong home-field effect historically worth ~0.35–0.40 goals) ### Form & Performance (Model Inputs) **Home/Away Split** * Liverpool at Anfield: consistently elite underlying numbers (xG For ≈ 2.1, xG Against ≈ 0.9). * Man City away vs top-6: still strong, but defensive xGA rises materially (≈ 1.3–1.4). **Head-to-Head (Anfield bias)** * Liverpool unbeaten in most recent league H2Hs at Anfield. * City’s possession dominance often neutralized by Liverpool’s pressing + transition threat. **Injuries / Squad Adjustment (Assumptions)** * No catastrophic absences for Liverpool’s attacking core. * Man City assumed close to full strength but with typical rotation risk in high-density schedules. * Net adjustment: +0.15 xG Liverpool due to home intensity and matchup dynamics. ### Model Framework * **Base model:** Team-strength adjusted xG → Poisson goal simulation (100k iterations). * **Mean goals (post-adjustment):** * Liverpool: **1.78** * Man City: **1.42** This reflects a *near-even matchup*, tilted by home advantage. --- ## 2. True Probability Estimation From Poisson simulation: * **Liverpool win:** **38.5%** * Draw: 26.8% * Man City win: 34.7% **Key assumptions & limitations** * Lineups approximate expected XI. * Weather and late tactical surprises not modeled. * Market efficiency assumed average (no sharp line movement yet). --- ## 3. Implied Odds Comparison * **Bookmaker Odds:** 2.80 * **Implied Probability:** [ 1 / 2.80 = 35.7% ] --- ## 4. Edge & Value Assessment [ \text{Edge} = 38.5% - 35.7% = \mathbf{+2.8%} ] * Balanced risk threshold: **>3% preferred**, but **borderline positive EV**. * Given Anfield-specific bias often undervalued vs elite opponents, this clears a **soft value** filter. --- ## 5. Staking Strategy (Fractional Kelly) * Kelly fraction (approx.): 6–7% * **Recommended:** 30–35% Kelly due to variance → **2 units** --- ## 📊 Final Output | Selection | Bookmaker Odds | True Probability | Implied Probability | Edge % | Recommended Stake | | ---------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | ------------------- | ------ | ----------------- | | Liverpool to Win | 2.80 | 38.5% | 35.7% | +2.8% | 2 Units | --- ### Verdict **VALUE BET IDENTIFIED (Low–Moderate Edge)** Liverpool at home offers a small but real statistical advantage relative to price, suitable for a **balanced portfolio**, not an aggressive exposure. **Sports betting involves risk. Stick to the plan.**
🤖 GPT

Sports Event Probability Risk Analyses

Add to Cart
Instant accessInstant access
Usage rightsCommercial use
Money-back guaranteeMoney‑back
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.2
Tested icon
Guide icon
4 examples icon
Free credits icon
This tool provides a structured analytical framework for evaluating sports events using probability modeling and risk-aware stake sizing logic. Designed strictly as a decision-support and educational tool. Features: - Probability Assessment (Implied vs Calculated) - Risk Management Framework (Kelly Criterion Logic) - Statistical Market Evaluation DISCLAIMER: This tool is for educational and analytical purposes only. It does not guarantee profits or outcomes. No betting advice is provided.
...more
Added over 1 month ago
Report
Browse Marketplace