Essay Writer With Quotes And Apa Citations

Introduction Microplastics are small plastic particles measuring less than five millimeters in size. They are often used in various industries, including cosmetics, clothing, and packaging. Unfortunately, they also end up in our oceans, lakes, and rivers, where they are harmful to the environment and to the animals living in these bodies of water. Reducing the amount of microplastics in the environment is crucial for the future of our planet. This essay will argue that reducing microplastics in our environment is essential to preserving our ecosystem and preventing harm to wildlife. Body Paragraph 1: Environmental Impact of Microplastics Microplastics have become a significant problem for the environment, as they pose a severe threat to marine life and aquatic ecosystems. Not only are they incredibly durable, but they are also small enough to be ingested by a wide range of organisms, from plankton to whales. When marine life ingests these particles, they can become lodged in their digestive system, leading to starvation or suffocation. According to a report published by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), over 700 marine species, including sea turtles, whales, and seabirds, are at risk of ingesting microplastics. When these animals consume microplastics, the toxins and chemicals present in the particles can enter their bodies and cause severe damage to their health. Studies have shown that ingesting microplastics can cause physical damage to marine life, including inflammation, tumors, and reproductive disorders. In addition to the harmful effects on marine life, microplastics can also have a severe impact on the overall health of our oceans. These particles can accumulate in the water and on the ocean floor, disrupting natural ecosystems and interfering with the food chain. This, in turn, can lead to a decline in fish populations, which can have a significant impact on the fishing industry and the economy. Body Paragraph 2: Human Health Concerns While the impact of microplastics on marine life and the environment is concerning, their effect on human health is equally worrying. Microplastics are found in a variety of products, including personal care products, synthetic textiles, and packaging materials. When these products are disposed of improperly, the microplastics can enter the environment, where they can be ingested by humans. Studies have shown that microplastics can enter the human body through various means, including ingestion, inhalation, and even through the skin. Once inside the body, these particles can accumulate and cause damage to organs and tissues. Ingestion of microplastics has been linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and changes in the gut microbiome, which can lead to a range of health problems, including autoimmune disorders, metabolic disorders, and even cancer. A study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology found that microplastics have been found in a range of food products, including seafood, salt, and drinking water. The researchers estimated that the average person ingests approximately 5 grams of plastic per week, which is equivalent to a credit card’s weight. Another example is the Great Lakes, which contain an estimated 22 million pounds of plastic waste. In a study published in Environmental Science & Technology, researchers found that microplastics are present in all five of the Great Lakes. As a result, they are being ingested by fish and other aquatic organisms, which can then be consumed by humans. Furthermore, reducing microplastics in our environment can have economic benefits as well. The tourism industry relies heavily on the health of our oceans, rivers, and lakes. By reducing the amount of plastic waste and microplastics in these bodies of water, we can preserve their natural beauty and attract more visitors, ultimately boosting the economy. Counterargument: Cost and Feasibility One of the main arguments against reducing microplastics in the environment is the cost and feasibility of doing so. Some people argue that removing microplastics from our oceans and rivers would be too expensive and challenging. However, there are several cost-effective ways to reduce the amount of microplastics in our environment. One approach is to reduce the production and use of single-use plastics, such as straws, plastic bags, and disposable utensils. This can be achieved through government regulations and public awareness campaigns. Another approach is to improve waste management practices, such as increasing recycling rates and reducing the amount of plastic waste that ends up in landfills and the environment. Another counterargument is that it is the responsibility of individuals to reduce their use of plastics and properly dispose of them, rather than relying on government and industry action to reduce microplastics in the environment. While it is true that individual responsibility is important in reducing plastic waste, it is not enough on its own. Individuals can only do so much to reduce their plastic consumption and properly dispose of waste. Industry and government action is necessary to address the root causes of the issue and reduce the amount of plastic waste that enters our environment in the first place. This can be done through initiatives such as banning single-use plastics and implementing more sustainable packaging options. Conclusion In conclusion, the negative impacts of microplastics on the environment and human health cannot be ignored. It is crucial that we take action to reduce the amount of microplastics in our environment, through both individual actions and government and industry initiatives. Reducing microplastics in our environment is essential to preserving our ecosystem and preventing harm to wildlife. The negative impact of microplastics on the environment and human health cannot be overstated. While the cost and feasibility of reducing microplastics may be a concern, the long-term benefits of doing so make it a necessary initiative. It is up to individuals, governments, and businesses to take action and reduce the use and spread of microplastics in our environment. These far-reaching benefits gained from reducing microplastics, from protecting the health of our wildlife to preserving the beauty of our natural landscapes and boosting the economy, cannot be overstated. By working together, we can create a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable environment for generations to come. References: Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D. J., Lahive, E., & Svendsen, C. (2017). Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 127-141. NOAA. (2021). Microplastics. Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts-education-resources/microplastics Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Halpern, B. S., Hentschel, B. T., Hoh, E., Karapanagioti, H. K., … & Thompson, R. C. (2013). Policy: Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature, 494(7436), 169-171. Shi, H., Liu, J., & Cai, Y. (2021). Risks and challenges of microplastics to freshwater fish in China: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 218, 112306. Thompson, R. C., Moore, C. J., vom Saal, F. S., & Swan, S. H. (2009). Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2153-2166. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “Microplastics: What Are They and Why Do We Care?” NOAA, 22 May 2020, https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts-education-resources/microplastics-what-are-they-and. Kosuth, Mary, et al. “Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health.” Current Environmental Health Reports, vol. 6, no.