Prompt Details
Model
Chat - (gpt-5.6)
Token size
751
Example input
[SERVICE_OR_OFFER]: Residential real estate listing photography service
[TARGET_CUSTOMER]: Real estate agents preparing a property for market
[CURRENT_INTAKE]: “Client Name Property Address Phone Number Email How many photos do you need? What rooms should we photograph? Do you need drone photos? Do you need twilight photos? What date would you like? What time would you like? Tell us anything else we should know. Please upload any inspiration photos you have.”
Example output
Example 1
Readiness Verdict
Readiness Score: 68/100
The intake captures basic contact information, property address, desired services, and scheduling preferences, but several operational details remain unresolved.
Three biggest readiness gaps:
Property access is not addressed. The photographer needs to know how access will be provided and whether anyone must be present.
Scheduling is underspecified. A requested date and time do not establish whether the property is actually available during that window.
Service scope is partly ambiguous. “How many photos?” and “What rooms?” place planning responsibility on the agent without providing useful service parameters.
Friction Map
Intake Element
Problem
Friction Level
Likely Consequence
Recommendation
Property Address
Useful but incomplete without access information
High
Photographer may arrive without access
Add access method
Number of photos
Customer may not know appropriate quantity
Medium
Unclear scope
Offer service/package options
Rooms
Open-ended response can be incomplete
Medium
Follow-up required
Use room checklist
Date/time
Doesn't establish property availability
High
Scheduling conflict
Ask for preferred window + access availability
Drone photos
Clear yes/no question
Low
Minimal
Retain
Twilight photos
Clear service option
Low
Minimal
Retain
Inspiration photos
Potentially unnecessary
Low
Extra completion burden
Make optional
Missing Information
Property occupancy/access status
Preferred scheduling window rather than a single assumed appointment time
Whether the property will be photo-ready
Desired package/service level
Any special property features requiring attention
Contact person for day-of access
REMOVE / REWRITE / ADD
REMOVE
“How many photos do you need?” unless the service is custom-priced by image count.
REWRITE
“What rooms should we photograph?” → “Which areas should be included? Select all that apply: bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, living areas, dining area, exterior, yard, garage, other.”
“What date would you like?” → “Select your preferred date and one backup date.”
ADD
“How will the photographer access the property?”
“Will the property be photo-ready at the scheduled time?”
“Is anyone required to be present?”
“Are there specific features you want highlighted?”
Back-and-Forth Risk
No access instructions → Add an access method field.
Property isn't ready → Add a photo-readiness confirmation.
Requested time isn't workable → Collect a preferred window and backup.
Unclear scope → Use service/package selections.
Special features are missed → Add a short priority-features field.
Improved Intake Architecture
Client/contact information
Property information
Service/package selection
Scheduling and access
Property readiness
Optional priorities
Final confirmation
Readiness Checklist
Required: Client contact information
Required: Property address
Required: Service/package selection
Required: Preferred appointment window
Required: Access method
Required: Photo-readiness confirmation
Useful: Priority property features
Useful: Backup appointment date
Optional: Inspiration images
Final Priority Actions
Add property access information.
Replace open-ended service-scope questions with structured selections.
Collect a preferred time window and backup date.
Add a property-readiness confirmation.
Make inspiration images optional.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.6
Friction-to-Readiness Intake Auditor helps service businesses, consultants, agencies, coaches, freelancers, and client-facing teams improve the information they collect before a service begins. Instead of simply reviewing an intake form for completeness, it audits the entire pre-service information flow and identifies where missing, ambiguous, redundant, poorly ordered, or difficult-to-answer questions may create unnecessary back-and-forth.
...more
Added 2 weeks ago
