Prompt Details
Model
(claude-4-6-sonnet)
Token size
238
Example input
[SCENARIO]: Beispiel 1 — No Reciprocity, Low Enforcement, High Exposure, Existential Threat Inputs: SCENARIO: "Employer withholds final salary after termination without written justification
[RECIPROCITY]: no
[ENFORCEMENT_SANCTION_STRENGTH]: low
[PERSONAL_EXPOSURE_LEVEL]: high
[STRUCTURAL_THREAT_SEVERITY]: existential
Example output
{
"case_context_summary": "Withheld final salary with no enforcement backstop.",
"observations": [
"No written justification provided.",
"Formal demand ignored.",
"Labor court possible but costly."
],
"inferences": [
"Counterparty exploits enforcement gap.",
"High personal exposure increases escalation risk."
],
"hypotheses": [
"Hypothesis: Delay is strategic, not administrative."
],
"risk_matrix": {
"overall_risk_level": "CRITICAL",
"compliance_risk_level": "HIGH",
"legal_exposure_level": "HIGH",
"operational_risk_level": "CRITICAL"
},
"afrb_classification": {
"field": "Field B — Unfair + Legal",
"strategy": "TARGETED_ESCALATION",
"risk_flags": ["HARD_ASYMMETRY", "ENFORCEMENT_GAP", "EXISTENTIAL_THREAT"]
},
"recommended_actions": {
"immediate_next_steps": ["File formal written demand with deadline."],
"documentation_checklist": ["Contract", "Pay slips", "Termination letter", "All correspondence"],
"escalation_thresholds": ["Escalate to labor court if no response within 14 days."]
},
"missing_information": ["Written termination reason.", "Final pay calculation breakdown."]
}
Instant access
Commercial useBy downloading this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
1
Downloads
1
Favorites
11
Views
CLAUDE-4-6-SONNET
When the other side breaks the rules but your options feel blocked — this prompt applies the AFRB framework to classify your situation: Fair/Legal, Unfair/Legal, Greyzone, or Blocked. Output: field classification, strategy recommendation, risk flags (enforcement gap, hard asymmetry, systematic abuse), and structured reasoning. Facts only. No moralizing.
...more
Added over 1 month ago
