PromptBase
Upgrade
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Create
Hire
Login
Chat
Sell
Explore

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - (gpt-6-luna)
Token size
4,989
Example input
[LOSS RUN PACKAGE]: Please review the attached loss-run package for a commercial property and general liability submission. The package contains four loss-run PDFs from the incumbent carrier covering: - 2022–2023 - 2023–2024 - 2024–2025 - 2025–2026 All four documents appear to relate to the same insured and include policy-period information, claim listings, paid amounts, incurred amounts, claim status, and valuation dates. The documents are readable and the policy periods are clearly stated. The most recent loss run is valued as of August 31, 2026. The claim listings show three reported claims across the four policy periods. Each claim has a claim number, date of loss, description, status, paid amount, and incurred amount. [EXPECTED POLICY PERIODS OR COMPARISON BASELINE]: 2022–2023 2023–2024 2024–2025 2025–2026 [VALUATION / CURRENTNESS REQUIREMENTS OR REFERENCE]: The loss-run package should contain identifiable valuation information for each policy period. The most recent available loss information should be valued as of August 31, 2026. [ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS]: Determine whether the package is sufficiently complete and usable for preliminary underwriting review. Identify any material missing or unclear information, but do not assess the quality of the loss experience or make an underwriting recommendation.
Example output
## OUTPUT 01 — LOSS RUN REVIEW MATRIX | FIELD / REVIEW AREA | OBSERVED INFORMATION | STATUS | ISSUE / FINDING | SOURCE | FOLLOW-UP | | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Policy Period | The customer input identifies four expected periods: 2022–2023, 2023–2024, 2024–2025, and 2025–2026. The underlying loss-run PDFs are not available for inspection in the current conversation. | UNVERIFIED | The supplied description cannot substitute for direct review of the four source documents. Actual period representation, duplication, and document-level evidence could not be verified. | No loss-run source document available for inspection | Provide the four loss-run PDFs. | | Missing Period | Review baseline contains four expected periods. | UNVERIFIED | It cannot be established from the source documents whether all four periods are actually represented because the PDFs are unavailable. | Review baseline supplied by customer; no source PDFs available | Provide the loss-run documents for period-by-period reconciliation. | | Valuation / Currentness | Customer input states that the most recent loss run is valued as of August 31, 2026 and that valuation information is stated for each period. | UNVERIFIED | The stated valuation information has not been verified against the underlying loss runs. Period-specific valuation references remain unreviewed. | Customer-provided description; underlying documents unavailable | Provide the source PDFs so valuation/currentness statements can be verified. | | Claim-Level Completeness | Customer input states that three claims are shown and that claim number, date of loss, description, status, paid amount, and incurred amount are present. | UNVERIFIED | Claim-level fields, blanks, truncation, policy-period assignment, and other visible information cannot be checked without the actual claim listings. | Customer-provided description; underlying documents unavailable | Provide the source PDFs for claim-by-claim review. | | Readability | Customer input states that the documents are readable. | UNVERIFIED | Actual readability, page quality, truncation, obscured fields, and table structure cannot be independently assessed without the PDFs. | Customer-provided description; underlying documents unavailable | Provide the source PDFs. | | Blank / Unclear Sections | No source pages or claim tables are available for inspection. | UNVERIFIED | Blank or unclear fields cannot be identified or distinguished from explicit zero/none/not-applicable entries. | No loss-run source document available for inspection | Provide the complete documents, including all claim tables/pages. | | Apparent Inconsistency | No underlying documents are available for cross-document comparison. | UNVERIFIED | Cross-period or cross-document conflicts cannot be tested. | No loss-run source documents available for inspection | Provide all four loss runs for comparison. | | Other Usability Issue | The described loss-run package is not accessible as reviewable source evidence in the current conversation. | VERIFIED | The substantive review cannot be completed from the package description alone. | Current conversation input | Supply the four loss-run PDFs. | ## OUTPUT 02 — MISSING / UNUSABLE LOSS INFORMATION BRIEF **Overall Status:** **UNVERIFIED** **Summary of Material Issues:** The underlying four loss-run PDFs are not available for direct inspection in the current conversation. The customer input describes their contents, but that description is not a substitute for reviewing the source documents. Accordingly, policy-period representation, valuation/currentness, claim-level completeness, readability, blanks/unclear fields, and cross-document consistency cannot be reliably verified. **Missing Information:** The four source loss-run PDFs covering: * 2022–2023 * 2023–2024 * 2024–2025 * 2025–2026 **Unclear / Unusable Information:** The actual claim listings, valuation statements, document metadata, page content, tables, and individual claim fields are unavailable for inspection. It therefore cannot be established from source evidence whether any fields are blank, truncated, inconsistent, or otherwise unusable. **Apparent Conflicts / Inconsistencies:** None can be identified reliably because the underlying documents are unavailable for comparison. **Affected Policy Periods:** All four expected periods remain unverified at the source-document level. **Affected Claims / Records:** The three reported claims described in the customer input remain unverified at the claim-record level. **Follow-Up Required:** Provide the four actual loss-run PDFs so that the package can be reviewed document-by-document and claim-by-claim, with valuation/currentness and cross-period consistency checked directly against the source evidence. No underwriting, pricing, reserve, profitability, or coverage conclusion has been made.
GPT

Loss Run Review Usability Gate

Add to Cart
PromptBase Select
Get this prompt + 9 more with SelectFrom $14/mo · Cancel anytimeFrom $14/mo · Cancel anytime
View Select
Instant accessInstant access
Usage rightsCommercial use
Money-back guaranteeMoney‑back
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-6-LUNA
Tested icon
Guide icon
4 examples icon
Free credits icon
A specialized pre-underwriting prompt for reviewing multi-document loss-run packages. It checks policy periods, valuation/currentness, claim-level completeness, readability, blank or unclear data, and apparent inconsistencies, then produces a Loss Run Review Matrix and Missing / Unusable Loss Information Brief with source traceability.
...more
Added 3 days ago
Report
Browse Marketplace