PromptBase
Upgrade
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Create
Hire
Login
Chat
Sell
Explore

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - (gpt-5.5)
Token size
717
Example input
[DEAL_CONTEXT]: A regional manufacturer is evaluating a majority acquisition before issuing a non-binding offer within three weeks. [TARGET_PROFILE]: The target makes industrial components at two plants, relies on three major customers, and has a founder-led sales team. [AVAILABLE_EVIDENCE]: Three years of management accounts, customer revenue summary, equipment list, organization chart, and management interviews; no signed customer contracts supplied yet. [REVIEW_SCOPE_AND_CONSTRAINTS]: Commercial, operational, financial, and integration review; legal and tax conclusions reserved for advisers; anonymized data only.
Example output
1. Transaction Decision Frame Transaction objective and stage A regional manufacturer is evaluating a majority acquisition of an industrial-components target before issuing a non-binding offer within three weeks. Supplied scope The supplied review scope covers commercial, operational, financial, and integration review. Fixed constraints Legal and tax conclusions are reserved for advisers. The review must use anonymized data only. Signed customer contracts have not yet been supplied. Decisions this review cannot make This review cannot value the target, recommend whether to proceed or abandon the transaction, confirm legal enforceability of contracts, conclude on tax exposure, validate undisclosed liabilities, or determine whether the offer terms are appropriate. 2. Evidence Ledger Supplied facts: The buyer is a regional manufacturer evaluating a majority acquisition. The target makes industrial components at two plants. The target relies on three major customers. The sales team is founder-led. Evidence supplied includes three years of management accounts, customer revenue summary, equipment list, organization chart, and management interviews. No signed customer contracts have been supplied yet. The review scope includes commercial, operational, financial, and integration review. Legal and tax conclusions are reserved for advisers. Data is anonymized. Management or seller claims: Information obtained through management interviews. Any statements about customer stability, plant performance, equipment condition, sales pipeline, or founder relationships from interviews should be treated as claims until supported by documents. Assumptions to test: The three major customers are continuing customers rather than one-off revenue contributors. The customer revenue summary reconciles to the management accounts. Equipment listed is available, operational, and relevant to current production. The founder-led sales team has transferable customer relationships. The organization chart reflects actual operating responsibilities. Critical unknowns: Terms, duration, renewal rights, termination rights, pricing mechanisms, and assignment restrictions in customer contracts. Customer concentration by revenue, margin, plant, product line, and tenure. Quality of management accounts and whether they reconcile to underlying records. Plant capacity, utilization, maintenance requirements, and operational bottlenecks. Founder dependency in sales and post-close role expectations. Integration requirements between buyer and target operations. Constraints: Three-week timeline before non-binding offer. Anonymized data only. Legal and tax conclusions outside this review. 3. Due Diligence Coverage Map Workstream Evidence supplied Evidence missing What the gap prevents us from concluding Dependency Qualified reviewer Commercial Customer revenue summary; management interviews Signed customer contracts; customer tenure; renewal history; pipeline detail; customer-by-product and customer-by-plant analysis Cannot conclude whether revenue from the three major customers is contractually committed, recurring, transferable, or vulnerable to termination Legal review of customer contracts; financial reconciliation to revenue Commercial diligence lead with legal adviser for contract terms Financial Three years of management accounts; customer revenue summary Trial balances, revenue detail, customer gross margin, working-capital detail, adjustments, accounting-policy support Cannot conclude quality of earnings, revenue consistency, profitability by customer, or normalization needs Commercial concentration analysis; operational capacity review Accounting / financial diligence adviser Operations Equipment list; two-plant profile; management interviews Plant capacity, utilization, maintenance records, downtime history, capex needs, production volumes, quality records Cannot conclude whether current operations can sustain reported revenue or whether equipment requires material investment Financial review of capex and margins; integration review Operations diligence specialist People Organization chart; founder-led sales team Founder role detail, sales team responsibilities, retention plans, compensation structure, succession coverage Cannot conclude whether customer relationships and sales execution are transferable after majority acquisition Commercial customer dependency review; integration planning People / HR diligence adviser Integration Organization chart; equipment list; two-plant operating model Integration plan, systems map, reporting processes, operational handoff assumptions, founder transition expectations Cannot conclude integration complexity, Day 1 dependencies, or post-close operating requirements Operations, people, and commercial reviews Integration lead Legal/regulatory No legal review in scope; no signed customer contracts supplied Customer contracts and legal ownership/assignment terms Cannot conclude enforceability, change-of-control implications, contract assignment, or legal commitments Commercial review depends on contract terms Legal adviser Tax Tax conclusions reserved for advisers Tax filings, tax structure, tax exposures Cannot conclude tax position or transaction tax implications Financial diligence may identify accounting items for tax adviser Tax adviser 4. Blindspot Register Blindspot Evidence basis Potential decision impact Urgency Next evidence request Owner Escalation condition Customer commitment unknown for three major customers Target relies on three major customers; no signed customer contracts supplied Non-binding offer assumptions may rely on revenue that is not yet contractually evidenced High Signed or current customer contracts, renewal history, and summary of key terms Commercial diligence lead; legal adviser Escalate if contracts are unavailable, unsigned, expired, non-transferable, or materially inconsistent with revenue summary Founder-led sales dependency Target has founder-led sales team; organization chart and interviews supplied Integration and continuity assumptions may depend on founder availability and relationship transfer High Founder role description, customer-contact map, sales process documentation, proposed post-close involvement Integration lead; people adviser Escalate if key accounts are primarily managed by the founder without documented handover plan Management accounts not yet supported by underlying detail Three years of management accounts supplied Financial diligence cannot assess quality of earnings or revenue reliability from summaries alone High Trial balances, general ledger extracts, revenue detail, adjustments, and reconciliation to customer summary Financial diligence adviser Escalate if management accounts do not reconcile to underlying records or customer revenue summary Operational capacity and equipment condition not evidenced Equipment list and two-plant profile supplied Offer assumptions may depend on unverified plant capacity, maintenance, or capex needs Medium Capacity reports, utilization data, maintenance logs, downtime history, recent capex records Operations reviewer Escalate if current production depends on constrained, obsolete, or undocumented critical equipment Integration requirements undefined Majority acquisition context; organization chart and equipment list supplied Buyer cannot assess Day 1 readiness, operating dependencies, or integration effort Medium Systems/process map, operating model, Day 1 dependencies, integration assumptions Integration lead Escalate if critical systems or operational responsibilities lack owners 5. Contradiction And Concentration Tests Inconsistent claims No contradiction evidenced from the supplied materials. However, interview statements should be tested against management accounts, customer revenue summaries, equipment records, and contracts once supplied. Single points of dependency The founder-led sales team is a potential key-person dependency. Evidence that would confirm this concern includes customer relationships managed primarily by the founder, lack of documented sales processes, or customer communication history centered on the founder. Evidence that would disconfirm it includes distributed account ownership, documented CRM records, and evidence that non-founder sales staff manage major accounts. Customer concentration The target relies on three major customers. Evidence that would confirm concentration risk includes high revenue or margin dependence on those customers, customer-specific production requirements, or short termination provisions in contracts. Evidence that would disconfirm or bound the issue includes diversified revenue by product, multi-year customer history, signed commitments, and customer-by-margin analysis. Supplier concentration No supplier concentration evidenced in the supplied facts. Supplier dependency cannot be assessed without supplier list, supplier spend, or sourcing data. Operational concentration The target operates at two plants. Evidence needed includes revenue, product, capacity, and customer allocation by plant to assess whether either plant is a single point of failure. Unusual timing The three-week timeline before issuing a non-binding offer is compressed relative to unresolved contract and concentration evidence. This does not indicate misconduct; it limits what can be verified before the offer. 6. Evidence Request List Immediate: Signed or current customer contracts for the three major customers, with key terms summarized by legal adviser. Customer revenue by month, product, plant, and customer for the period covered by management accounts. Reconciliation between customer revenue summary and management accounts. Founder and sales-team account ownership map. Plant-level revenue, production volume, capacity, utilization, and downtime summary. Maintenance logs and recent capex records for key equipment. Before valuation or terms review: Trial balances, general ledger detail, and management-account support for the three-year period. Customer gross margin and product gross margin analysis. Working-capital detail and seasonality information, if available. Sales pipeline and renewal/retention history for major customers. Equipment age, ownership status, condition, and replacement requirements. Draft integration assumptions, including Day 1 operating model and founder transition assumptions. Before signing or approval: Legal adviser review of customer contracts, assignment provisions, change-of-control provisions, termination rights, and enforceability. Tax adviser review of tax records and transaction implications. Final customer concentration analysis reconciled to financial records. Confirmed founder or key-person retention and transition plan, reviewed by qualified people adviser. Final integration plan with owners, dependencies, and unresolved risks. 7. Professional Review And Escalation Map Trigger Reviewer Question to resolve Signed customer contracts are supplied or remain unavailable Legal adviser What contractual rights, obligations, assignment restrictions, termination provisions, and change-of-control implications exist? Management accounts require validation against underlying records Accounting / financial diligence adviser Do the accounts reconcile to underlying records, and what adjustments or limitations should decision-makers understand? Any tax records or transaction structuring questions arise Tax adviser What tax matters require review before terms, signing, or approval? Founder-led sales dependency affects continuity HR / people adviser and integration lead What retention, succession, or transition planning is required for customer relationship continuity? Equipment condition or plant capacity affects operating assumptions Operations specialist Can current equipment and plant capacity support the supplied operating profile, and what evidence supports that view? Integration assumptions depend on systems, reporting, or operating handoffs Integration lead What Day 1 requirements, dependencies, and owners must be confirmed before approval? 8. Decision-Meeting Brief What is supported: The target is an industrial-components manufacturer operating at two plants. The buyer is evaluating a majority acquisition before a non-binding offer within three weeks. Three years of management accounts, customer revenue summary, equipment list, organization chart, and management interviews are available. The target relies on three major customers and has a founder-led sales team. What remains unverified: Whether major-customer revenue is contractually committed or transferable. Whether customer revenue summary reconciles to management accounts. Whether plant capacity, equipment condition, and maintenance requirements support the operating profile. Whether sales relationships can transfer without the founder. Whether integration requirements are manageable within the buyer’s expectations. Top five questions: What are the contractual terms, renewal rights, termination rights, and assignment restrictions for the three major customers? Does customer revenue reconcile to management accounts by customer, product, and plant? How dependent are customer relationships on the founder? What plant or equipment constraints could affect continuity or capex needs? What must be true operationally and organizationally for Day 1 integration to work? Dependencies between workstreams: Commercial concentration review depends on legal contract review and financial reconciliation. Financial review depends on customer revenue detail and management-account support. Integration review depends on operations evidence and founder/sales-team dependency analysis. Operations review may affect financial assumptions about capex, margin, and capacity. Suggested agenda for the next diligence meeting: Confirm data room status and anonymization constraints. Review major-customer evidence gaps and contract-request status. Walk through management-account reconciliation requirements. Review two-plant operations and equipment evidence requests. Discuss founder-led sales dependency and transition assumptions. Assign owners for immediate evidence requests and adviser escalation. This output is a preliminary evidence-gap framework and not legal, financial, tax, investment, security, or HR advice.
🤖 GPT

Ma Due Diligence Blindspot Mapper

Add to Cart
Instant accessInstant access
Usage rightsCommercial use
Money-back guaranteeMoney‑back
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.5
Tested icon
Guide icon
4 examples icon
Free credits icon
Turn fragmented acquisition information into an evidence-led due diligence blindspot map. This prompt separates supplied facts from claims and unknowns, tests contradictions across commercial, financial, operational, legal, technology, people, and integration areas, then produces prioritized evidence requests and escalation questions. It does not value a company, recommend a transaction, or replace qualified legal, financial, tax, security, or HR review.
...more
Added 1 week ago
Report
Browse Marketplace