Prompt Details
Model
Chat - (gpt-5.6)
Token size
4,683
Example input
[APPROVAL_POLICY_AND_DOCUMENTED_RULES]: Production database access requires approval from the employee's manager and the database owner. Security approval is required for high-risk access. Access must be time-limited. Rejected requests cannot be provisioned.
[ROLES_ACTORS_AND_RESPONSIBILITIES]: Employee: submits request. Manager: validates business need. Database Owner: validates resource access. Security Reviewer: reviews high-risk access. Provisioning System: grants access after all required approvals.
[APPROVAL_SCENARIOS_AND_WORKFLOW_CONTEXT]: Standard read-only access. High-risk write access requires Security approval. Requests may be rejected or returned for correction.
[AUTOMATION_AND_DELEGATION_REQUIREMENTS]: Reminder notifications may be automated. No automatic approval is documented. Delegation rules are not documented.
[VALIDITY_TIMING_AND_CHANGE_REQUIREMENTS]: Access must be time-limited. Exact approval timeout and expiration rules are not documented. Material changes require re-evaluation, but the exact rule is not documented.
Example output
๐ PHASE 1 โ Approval Requirement Reconstruction
Business Objective
Enable employees to obtain controlled production database access while ensuring that business, resource-owner, and security authorization requirements are satisfied before provisioning.
Requirement Classification
Requirement Source Classification Confidence
Manager approval required Policy DOCUMENTED RULE High
Database Owner approval required Policy DOCUMENTED RULE High
Security approval for high-risk access Policy DOCUMENTED RULE High
Access must be time-limited Policy DOCUMENTED RULE High
Employee submits request Roles EXPLICIT REQUIREMENT High
Provision only after required approvals Governance EXPLICIT REQUIREMENT High
Reminder notifications Automation EXPLICIT REQUIREMENT High
No automatic approval Automation input DOCUMENTED RULE High
Delegation behavior Missing UNRESOLVED OWNER DECISION High
Exact timeout duration Missing UNRESOLVED OWNER DECISION High
Exact expiration mechanism Missing UNRESOLVED OWNER DECISION High
Material-change reapproval rule Missing detail UNRESOLVED OWNER DECISION High
Approval instance/state representation Engineering need PROPOSED DESIGN Medium
Immutable audit event model Engineering structure PROPOSED DESIGN Medium
---
๐ฅ PHASE 2 โ Actor, Role & Authority Model
Actor Responsibility Approval Authority Scope Restrictions Delegation
Employee Submit request None Own requests Cannot approve own request Undocumented
Manager Validate business need Yes Employee's access request Must be eligible Undocumented
Database Owner Validate resource access Yes Owned database Must be eligible Undocumented
Security Reviewer Review high-risk access Yes High-risk requests Required only when applicable Undocumented
Provisioning System Execute approved access None Authorized requests Cannot decide policy approval N/A
Administrator System administration Not established Not established No approval authority should be assumed Undocumented
Key Governance Rule
A user having administrative access to the workflow system does not automatically establish approval authority.
---
๐งฉ PHASE 3 โ Approval Object & State Model
Confirmed / Required Concepts
Request
Approval decision
Reviewer assignment
Approval stage
Provisioning authorization
Audit event
Proposed Structural States
These are engineering structures, not documented organizational policy:
DRAFT
โ
SUBMITTED
โ
PENDING_APPROVAL
โ
PARTIALLY_APPROVED
โ
APPROVED
โ
PROVISIONING_AUTHORIZED
โ
PROVISIONED
Alternative paths:
PENDING_APPROVAL
โ
REJECTED
PENDING_APPROVAL
โ
RETURNED_FOR_CORRECTION
โ
SUBMITTED
For material changes:
APPROVED
โ
AMENDED
โ
RE_APPROVAL_REQUIRED
โ
PENDING_APPROVAL
These transition structures are PROPOSED DESIGN unless confirmed by the organization.
---
๐ PHASE 4 โ Workflow Path & Transition Architecture
Standard Read-Only Request
Employee submits request
โ
Validate request
โ
Manager Review
โ
Database Owner Review
โ
All mandatory approvals satisfied
โ
Provisioning Gate
โ
IAM Provisioning
Transition Matrix
Current State Trigger Actor Preconditions Next State Side Effect
Draft Submit Employee Required data present Submitted Audit submission
Submitted Validation succeeds System Valid request Pending Approval Assign reviewers
Pending Approval Manager approves Manager Eligible reviewer Partially Approved Record decision
Partially Approved DB Owner approves DB Owner Eligible reviewer Approved Record decision
Pending Approval Required reviewer rejects Reviewer Eligible reviewer Rejected Notify employee
Returned for Correction Corrected request submitted Employee Correction complete Pending Approval Create new version
Approved Provisioning gate passes System All gates satisfied Provisioning Authorized Emit provisioning event
Provisioning Authorized IAM succeeds System Valid authorization Provisioned Audit provisioning
---
๐ก๏ธ PHASE 5 โ Reviewer Eligibility & Approval Authority
Manager
Potential eligibility checks:
Reviewer is the requester's authorized manager.
Reviewer has active identity.
Reviewer is not the requester.
Reviewer has authority for the request scope.
Database Owner
Potential eligibility checks:
Reviewer is registered as owner of the requested database.
Reviewer is active.
Reviewer is not the requester.
Reviewer has authority over the requested resource.
Security Reviewer
Eligibility applies only when the request meets the documented high-risk condition.
Important Unresolved Rule
The policy does not establish whether eligibility is evaluated:
1. Only when the reviewer is assigned.
2. Only when the reviewer clicks Approve.
3. Both times.
Owner decision required.
---
๐ค PHASE 6 โ Automation & Delegation Logic
Decision Classification Reason
Send reminder Rule-based automation Explicitly permitted
Determine whether Security review is required Conditional automation Based on documented risk classification
Grant approval automatically Human-only No automatic approval documented
Provision after valid approvals Rule-based automation Explicit provisioning requirement
Delegate manager authority Unresolved No delegation rule documented
Delegation
Current specification:
Delegation is not authorized by the supplied policy.
The system should therefore not automatically invent delegation behavior.
Potential owner decisions:
Delegation allowed or prohibited?
Who can delegate?
What authority can be delegated?
Can the delegate approve high-risk access?
What happens to existing assignments when delegation expires?
---
๐งฎ PHASE 7 โ Approval Aggregation & Quorum Logic
Standard Access
Condition Required Decisions Aggregation Result
Standard read-only Manager + DB Owner Both required Approved
Manager approves + DB Owner approves Both ALL Approved
Manager approves + DB Owner rejects One rejection Mandatory approval failure Rejected
Manager approves + missing DB Owner Incomplete ALL Remains pending
Duplicate Manager approval Same approval repeated Duplicate rejected Existing decision retained
Ineligible approval Reviewer not eligible Invalid Decision not counted
High-Risk Access
Documented requirement:
Manager approval
+
Database Owner approval
+
Security approval
=
Required approval set
The policy does not document quorum alternatives such as "2 of 3."
Therefore:
No quorum reduction should be invented.
---
โฑ๏ธ PHASE 8 โ Timeout, Expiration & Escalation
Known
Access must be time-limited.
Reminder automation is permitted.
Unknown
Timer Status
Reviewer response deadline โ UNRESOLVED
Reminder interval โ UNRESOLVED
Escalation timing โ UNRESOLVED
Approval expiration โ UNRESOLVED
Access expiration Required, exact duration unresolved
Business-hour calculation โ UNRESOLVED
Holiday handling โ UNRESOLVED
Critical Principle
No response must not be interpreted as approval.
Possible design:
Pending Approval
โ
Deadline reached
โ
Escalation / expiration
But the exact behavior requires an owner decision.
---
โ๏ธ PHASE 9 โ Corrections, Amendments & Re-Approval
Proposed Change Classification
Change Suggested Treatment Status
Typographical correction No approval impact if non-material PROPOSED
Database changed Re-evaluation PROPOSED
Access level changed Re-approval PROPOSED
Read โ Write Re-approval PROPOSED
Risk level increases Security review required Based on documented risk rule
Supporting evidence changed Re-evaluate PROPOSED
Request scope changed Re-approval PROPOSED
Versioning
Each request should have:
Request ID
Request Version
Approval Instance ID
Approval Decision ID
Policy Version
Timestamp
Actor ID
This is a PROPOSED ENGINEERING DESIGN.
---
๐ PHASE 10 โ Approval Validity & Provisioning Gates
Approval is not automatically equivalent to provisioning authorization.
Provisioning Gate
Gate Required Condition Validation Failure
G1 Request submitted Request validation Block
G2 Manager approval Valid manager decision Block
G3 DB Owner approval Valid owner decision Block
G4 Security approval when high-risk Risk evaluation Block
G5 No rejection Decision evaluation Block
G6 Required evidence present Evidence validation Block
G7 Access validity period present Request validation Block
G8 No re-approval pending Version validation Block
G9 Authorization not expired Time validation Block
G10 IAM provisioning available Integration validation Block
Only when all applicable gates pass:
APPROVED
โ
PROVISIONING AUTHORIZED
โ
IAM EXECUTION
---
๐ PHASE 11 โ Exception, Rejection & Failure Handling
Failure Detection State Recovery Human Action Audit
Manager rejects Decision event Rejected New request/correction according to policy Employee Required
DB Owner rejects Decision event Rejected New request/correction Employee Required
Invalid reviewer Eligibility check Pending / Assignment Error Reassign Workflow admin Required
Duplicate approval Decision validation Existing state Ignore/reject duplicate None unless needed Required
Notification failure Delivery failure Existing state Retry Admin if persistent Required
IAM provisioning failure Integration response Provisioning Blocked Retry/investigate Operator Required
Automation failure System error Existing safe state Retry/manual intervention Authorized operator Required
Expired authorization Timer Provisioning Blocked New authorization Owner/requester Required
No failure should silently produce an approval.
---
๐ PHASE 12 โ Policy-to-Requirement Traceability
Policy / Rule Req ID Workflow Behavior Component Validation Status
Manager approval required REQ-001 Manager stage mandatory Workflow Engine Approval test Confirmed
DB Owner approval required REQ-002 Owner stage mandatory Workflow Engine Approval test Confirmed
Security for high-risk REQ-003 Conditional Security stage Rules Engine Risk tests Confirmed
Time-limited access REQ-004 Expiration required IAM/Workflow Expiration test Confirmed
Rejected requests not provisioned REQ-005 Provisioning gate blocks rejection Workflow/IAM Rejection test Confirmed
Reminder automation REQ-006 Automated reminders Notification Service Timer test Confirmed
Delegation REQ-007 Not yet defined Workflow Engine Owner decision Unresolved
Approval timeout REQ-008 Not yet defined Workflow Engine Owner decision Unresolved
---
๐งช PHASE 13 โ Workflow Validation & Test Design
Test 1 โ Standard Approval
Input: Read-only production access.
Expected:
Submitted
โ Pending Approval
โ Manager Approved
โ DB Owner Approved
โ Approved
โ Provisioning Authorized
โ Provisioned
Audit must contain both approval decisions.
Test 2 โ Manager Rejects
Submitted
โ Pending Approval
โ Manager Rejects
โ Rejected
Provisioning must not execute.
Test 3 โ High-Risk Access
Submitted
โ Manager Approval
โ DB Owner Approval
โ Security Approval
โ Approved
Security approval is mandatory when the documented high-risk condition applies.
Test 4 โ Missing Approval
Manager approves but Database Owner has not responded.
Expected:
Partially Approved
Provisioning remains blocked.
Test 5 โ Ineligible Reviewer
A user without database-owner authority attempts approval.
Expected:
Approval rejected as unauthorized
The invalid decision must not satisfy the approval requirement.
Test 6 โ Duplicate Decision
The same reviewer submits two approval actions.
Expected:
First valid decision retained.
Duplicate rejected/ignored.
Audit event recorded.
Test 7 โ Provisioning Failure
All approvals are valid but IAM provisioning fails.
Expected:
Approved
โ Provisioning Authorized
โ Provisioning Blocked
The failure must not change the approval history.
---
โ ๏ธ PHASE 14 โ Ambiguity, Conflict & Policy Gap Analysis
ID Severity Missing Rule Impact Owner
GAP-001 Critical Exact access duration Could grant excessive access Security/Policy Owner
GAP-002 High Approval timeout Requests could remain indefinitely pending Workflow Owner
GAP-003 High Delegation rules Cannot safely replace unavailable approvers Governance Owner
GAP-004 High Approval expiration Unclear how long approval remains usable Security Owner
GAP-005 High Amendment classification Existing approval validity unclear Policy Owner
GAP-006 Medium Escalation behavior Delayed approvals Workflow Owner
GAP-007 Medium Business-hour calculation Timer inconsistency Workflow Owner
GAP-008 Medium Reviewer eligibility timing Potential stale authority IAM Owner
Example Owner Decision
GAP-001: Access Duration
Known:
Access must be time-limited.
Missing:
Exact maximum duration.
Whether duration varies by risk level.
Possible proposals:
Fixed maximum duration.
Risk-based maximum duration.
Owner-defined duration within a policy maximum.
These are proposals, not policy.
---
๐๏ธ PHASE 15 โ Engineering Specification Architecture
Data Model
Request
Proposed fields:
request_id
request_version
requester_id
resource_id
access_type
risk_level
requested_start
requested_end
status
policy_version
created_at
updated_at
Approval Instance
approval_instance_id
request_id
request_version
stage
required_role
assigned_reviewer
status
assigned_at
completed_at
Approval Decision
decision_id
approval_instance_id
actor_id
decision
timestamp
reason
policy_version
request_version
Audit Event
event_id
request_id
event_type
actor_id
timestamp
previous_state
new_state
request_version
policy_version
evidence_reference
These field definitions are PROPOSED ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, not claims about an existing database.
---
API / Service Requirements
Proposed operations:
CreateRequest
SubmitRequest
AssignReviewer
ApproveRequest
RejectRequest
ReturnForCorrection
AmendRequest
CancelRequest
EvaluateApproval
EvaluateProvisioningGate
ProvisionAccess
RecordAuditEvent
Authorization must be evaluated server-side.
The client must never be trusted to declare that an actor is eligible.
---
Workflow Engine
Must support:
State transitions
Conditional approval stages
Reviewer eligibility
Parallel/mandatory stages
Timers
Notifications
Rejection handling
Version tracking
Re-approval
Provisioning gates
---
๐ Event & Notification Requirements
Proposed events:
REQUEST_SUBMITTED
APPROVAL_ASSIGNED
APPROVAL_GRANTED
APPROVAL_REJECTED
REQUEST_RETURNED
REQUEST_AMENDED
REAPPROVAL_REQUIRED
PROVISIONING_AUTHORIZED
PROVISIONING_FAILED
ACCESS_PROVISIONED
ACCESS_EXPIRED
Notifications should never themselves modify approval state unless explicitly authorized by policy.
---
๐ PHASE 16 โ Final Approval Workflow Specification
1. Executive Summary
The workflow controls production database access through mandatory authorization stages.
Standard access requires:
Manager Approval
+
Database Owner Approval
High-risk access additionally requires:
Security Approval
Provisioning occurs only after all applicable approvals and provisioning gates are satisfied.
---
2. Source-of-Truth Classification
๐ Documented Rules
Manager approval.
Database Owner approval.
Security approval for high-risk access.
Time-limited access.
Rejected requests cannot be provisioned.
๐ Explicit Requirements
Employee submits request.
Approval decisions are auditable.
Reminder notifications may be automated.
IAM performs downstream provisioning.
๐งฑ Structural Defaults
None should be treated as organizational policy.
๐ก Proposed Designs
State machine structure.
Approval-instance entity.
Request-version model.
Immutable audit events.
Provisioning authorization state.
Server-side eligibility validation.
โ Owner Decisions Required
Delegation.
Approval timeout.
Escalation.
Exact access duration.
Approval expiration.
Amendment classification.
Re-approval rules.
Business-hour timer calculation.
---
๐ Approval Rule Matrix
Rule ID Condition Reviewer Requirement Aggregation Outcome
AR-001 Standard access Manager Approve ALL Continue
AR-002 Standard access DB Owner Approve ALL Approve
AR-003 High-risk access Security Approve ALL Approve
AR-004 Any mandatory rejection Relevant reviewer Reject Mandatory failure Reject
AR-005 Missing mandatory decision Assigned reviewer None Incomplete Remain pending
---
๐ก๏ธ Provisioning Gate
Request Valid
AND
Required Approvals Valid
AND
No Rejection
AND
No Re-approval Required
AND
Required Evidence Present
AND
Access Validity Defined
AND
Authorization Not Expired
AND
Provisioning Prerequisites Satisfied
โ
PROVISIONING AUTHORIZED
---
๐งพ Audit Model
Every approval decision should retain:
Actor identity
Actor role
Decision
Timestamp
Request ID
Request version
Approval instance
Policy version
Evidence/reference
Previous state
Resulting state
Corrections and amendments must not overwrite historical decisions.
---
๐งช Highest-Value Test Set
1. Standard request with all approvals.
2. Manager rejection.
3. Database Owner rejection.
4. High-risk request requiring Security approval.
5. Missing mandatory approval.
6. Unauthorized reviewer attempt.
7. Duplicate approval.
8. Request correction.
9. Material amendment.
10. Re-approval after amendment.
11. Approval expiration.
12. Reviewer timeout.
13. Delegation attempt.
14. Notification failure.
15. IAM provisioning failure.
16. Race condition where two reviewers act simultaneously.
17. Request cancellation while approval is pending.
18. Policy version changes during an active request.
---
๐งญ Final Engineering Blueprint
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Employee Request โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Request Validate โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Manager Approval โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Database Owner โ
โ Approval โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ High Risk? โ
โโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโฌโโโโโโ
Yes No
โ โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ
โ Security โ โ
โ Approval โ โ
โโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโ โ
โโโโโโฌโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Approval & Policyโ
โ Validation โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Provisioning โ
โ Gates โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ IAM Provisioning โ
โโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Audit + Evidence โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ฏ Core Traceability
Documented Policy โ Requirement โ Approval Rule โ Workflow Transition โ Provisioning Gate โ Test โ Audit Evidence
The most important unresolved items are access duration, timeout, escalation, expiration, delegation, and amendment/re-approval rules. They should be resolved by the appropriate policy/governance owners before production implementation.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.6
Complex approval processes often fail at the engineering boundary: policies describe what should happen, while systems need precise rules for who approves, when approval is valid, how decisions aggregate, what happens after expiry, and when provisioning is allowed.
๐ Policies and documented business rules
๐ฅ Roles, reviewers, owners, and responsibilities
Turn ambiguous approval requirements into implementation-ready engineering specificationsโwithout silently inventing policy. ๐
...more
Added 3 weeks ago
