PromptBase
Upgrade
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Create
Hire
Login
Chat
Sell
Explore

Prompt Details

Model
(claude-5-sonnet)
Token size
2,690
Example input
[RAW_PROMPT]: Write me a song for my wedding video, romantic and happy, make something nice
Example output
--- AUDIT RESULTS πŸ“Š Quality Score: 45% (Under 50%: Needs significant work | 50-74%: Basic level, gaps remain | 75-89%: Good, minor gaps | 90-100%: Production-ready) Reason: The prompt communicates a clear, personal goal but omits nearly every technical and structural detail needed for a focused output. 1. Components: - Goal: Present β€” personal use, a song for a wedding video - Context: Partial β€” "wedding video" indicates use-case, but no narrative voice or whose perspective the lyrics take - Genre/Mood: Partial β€” mood ("romantic and happy") is given, but no genre or sub-genre - Constraints: Missing β€” no length, tempo/BPM, or key specified - Role/Audience: Partial β€” personal project implied, but not stated explicitly - Output Format: Missing β€” no verse/chorus/bridge structure or vocal-vs-instrumental preference - Technical Specs: Missing β€” no era/production-quality reference or instrumentation preference - Artist/Lyric-Reproduction Handling: Missing β€” no instruction to avoid naming real artists or reproducing existing lyrics/melodies 2. πŸ”’ Safety & Structure: - Protection against attempts to alter the prompt's behavior: Not Applicable β€” no such attempt present in this prompt - Personal or confidential data exposure risk: Not Applicable β€” no PII included ("my wedding" is generic, no names/dates/locations given) - Named-artist imitation risk: Not Applicable β€” no artist referenced - Verbatim lyric/melody reproduction risk: Not Applicable β€” no existing song requested - Medical/legal/financial/factual claims left unflagged: Not Applicable β€” this is a personal-use song, not an ad/jingle with claims 3. ⚠️ Risks Found: - Risk: Unfocused musical output. Cause: no genre/tempo specified. Impact: the generated song could land far from the couple's taste (e.g., wrong energy for a wedding video montage). - Risk: Mismatched deliverable. Cause: no vocal-vs-instrumental or structural format given. Impact: user may receive a fully sung song when they needed a short instrumental cue, or vice versa. - Risk: Wrong length/pacing. Cause: no duration or BPM constraint. Impact: song may run too long or too short for the video edit. 4. πŸ’‘ Recommendations: - 🚨 Critical: None β€” no safety violations present. - High: Add a specific genre/sub-genre and target length (e.g., "under 3 minutes" for a video overlay). - Medium: Specify vocal vs. instrumental, and whether lyrics should reference the couple's names/story or stay generic. - Low: Add a production-style reference (e.g., "acoustic, warm, intimate") and tempo range. 5. βœ… Improved Prompt: Write me a song for my wedding video, romantic and happy (assumption: acoustic pop style, since none was specified). The song should be (assumption: under 3 minutes long, suitable for a wedding video montage). Include (assumption: one verse, one chorus, and a bridge) with (assumption: a full vocal performance, warm and intimate in tone). Use (assumption: a moderate tempo, around 80-100 BPM) that fits a joyful, sentimental wedding moment. Keep the lyrics general and heartfelt rather than referencing real people by name unless I provide names. Do not imitate the voice, style, or lyrics of any specific real artist β€” describe the sound descriptively instead (e.g., "warm acoustic guitar, soft strings, gentle male or female vocal"). 6. Score Comparison: Original Score: 45% β€” clear personal goal, but missing constraints, format, and technical specs. Improved Score: 91% β€” adds genre, length, structure, vocal style, tempo, and artist/lyric-safety guidance; not 100% because true production-ready specificity (exact names, video length in seconds, preferred vocal gender) still requires info only the user can supply. Improvement: +46 points --- ℹ️ Note: This tool optimizes the initial prompt β€” it doesn't check music-copyright clearance for any genre, era, or sound referenced, or verify licensing for commercial use; final decisions remain the user's responsibility. Exact tag support and rendering are platform-controlled and may vary. AI is a probabilistic system, so wording and scores may vary slightly between runs. πŸ’‘ Don't have a prompt yet? Search "Music Request Auditor" on PromptBase to turn a rough client brief into a clear one, or "Music Prompt Generator" to build a ready-to-use prompt from scratch β€” then bring it back here to audit and refine. This prompt has reached production-ready quality. Reply "yes" for another pass, or "no" if this is good to use. ℹ️ Note: This tool has been tested on Claude Sonnet 5. Behavior on specific AI music platforms and their tag conventions is untested β€” verify against your target platform before use. Behavior on other AI models, versions, or non-English lyrics is also untested, and this tool is not intended as a sole safeguard against attempts to alter its behavior or as legal review for music-copyright clearance.
πŸŒ€ Claude

Music Auditors

Add to Cart
Instant accessInstant access
Usage rightsCommercial use
Money-back guaranteeMoney‑back
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-SONNET
Tested icon
Guide icon
4 examples icon
Free credits icon
πŸ“ŠAudit and rewrite AI music prompts (concepts, lyrics, instrumentals, jingles) into ready-to-use prompts. Get 8-point check, πŸ”’ behavior/IP/artist-imitation risk review, ranked risks, rewritten prompt, before/after scoring, 3 refinement passes. ⚠️ Analysis tool only, not liable for outcomes. AI is probabilistic β€” review before use. Built for Claude Sonnet 5; other AI models, providers, and versions are untested. Use at your own discretion.
...more
Updated 1 week ago
Report
Browse Marketplace