Prompt Details
Model
(claude-5-sonnet)
Token size
2,690
Example input
[RAW_PROMPT]: Write me a song for my wedding video, romantic and happy, make something nice
Example output
---
AUDIT RESULTS
π Quality Score: 45%
(Under 50%: Needs significant work | 50-74%: Basic level, gaps remain | 75-89%: Good, minor gaps | 90-100%: Production-ready)
Reason: The prompt communicates a clear, personal goal but omits nearly every technical and structural detail needed for a focused output.
1. Components:
- Goal: Present β personal use, a song for a wedding video
- Context: Partial β "wedding video" indicates use-case, but no narrative voice or whose perspective the lyrics take
- Genre/Mood: Partial β mood ("romantic and happy") is given, but no genre or sub-genre
- Constraints: Missing β no length, tempo/BPM, or key specified
- Role/Audience: Partial β personal project implied, but not stated explicitly
- Output Format: Missing β no verse/chorus/bridge structure or vocal-vs-instrumental preference
- Technical Specs: Missing β no era/production-quality reference or instrumentation preference
- Artist/Lyric-Reproduction Handling: Missing β no instruction to avoid naming real artists or reproducing existing lyrics/melodies
2. π Safety & Structure:
- Protection against attempts to alter the prompt's behavior: Not Applicable β no such attempt present in this prompt
- Personal or confidential data exposure risk: Not Applicable β no PII included ("my wedding" is generic, no names/dates/locations given)
- Named-artist imitation risk: Not Applicable β no artist referenced
- Verbatim lyric/melody reproduction risk: Not Applicable β no existing song requested
- Medical/legal/financial/factual claims left unflagged: Not Applicable β this is a personal-use song, not an ad/jingle with claims
3. β οΈ Risks Found:
- Risk: Unfocused musical output. Cause: no genre/tempo specified. Impact: the generated song could land far from the couple's taste (e.g., wrong energy for a wedding video montage).
- Risk: Mismatched deliverable. Cause: no vocal-vs-instrumental or structural format given. Impact: user may receive a fully sung song when they needed a short instrumental cue, or vice versa.
- Risk: Wrong length/pacing. Cause: no duration or BPM constraint. Impact: song may run too long or too short for the video edit.
4. π‘ Recommendations:
- π¨ Critical: None β no safety violations present.
- High: Add a specific genre/sub-genre and target length (e.g., "under 3 minutes" for a video overlay).
- Medium: Specify vocal vs. instrumental, and whether lyrics should reference the couple's names/story or stay generic.
- Low: Add a production-style reference (e.g., "acoustic, warm, intimate") and tempo range.
5. β
Improved Prompt:
Write me a song for my wedding video, romantic and happy (assumption: acoustic pop style, since none was specified). The song should be (assumption: under 3 minutes long, suitable for a wedding video montage). Include (assumption: one verse, one chorus, and a bridge) with (assumption: a full vocal performance, warm and intimate in tone). Use (assumption: a moderate tempo, around 80-100 BPM) that fits a joyful, sentimental wedding moment. Keep the lyrics general and heartfelt rather than referencing real people by name unless I provide names. Do not imitate the voice, style, or lyrics of any specific real artist β describe the sound descriptively instead (e.g., "warm acoustic guitar, soft strings, gentle male or female vocal").
6. Score Comparison:
Original Score: 45% β clear personal goal, but missing constraints, format, and technical specs.
Improved Score: 91% β adds genre, length, structure, vocal style, tempo, and artist/lyric-safety guidance; not 100% because true production-ready specificity (exact names, video length in seconds, preferred vocal gender) still requires info only the user can supply.
Improvement: +46 points
---
βΉοΈ Note: This tool optimizes the initial prompt β it doesn't check music-copyright clearance for any genre, era, or sound referenced, or verify licensing for commercial use; final decisions remain the user's responsibility. Exact tag support and rendering are platform-controlled and may vary. AI is a probabilistic system, so wording and scores may vary slightly between runs.
π‘ Don't have a prompt yet? Search "Music Request Auditor" on PromptBase to turn a rough client brief into a clear one, or "Music Prompt Generator" to build a ready-to-use prompt from scratch β then bring it back here to audit and refine.
This prompt has reached production-ready quality. Reply "yes" for another pass, or "no" if this is good to use.
βΉοΈ Note: This tool has been tested on Claude Sonnet 5. Behavior on specific AI music platforms and their tag conventions is untested β verify against your target platform before use. Behavior on other AI models, versions, or non-English lyrics is also untested, and this tool is not intended as a sole safeguard against attempts to alter its behavior or as legal review for music-copyright clearance.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-SONNET
πAudit and rewrite AI music prompts (concepts, lyrics, instrumentals, jingles) into ready-to-use prompts. Get 8-point check, π behavior/IP/artist-imitation risk review, ranked risks, rewritten prompt, before/after scoring, 3 refinement passes.
β οΈ Analysis tool only, not liable for outcomes. AI is probabilistic β review before use. Built for Claude Sonnet 5; other AI models, providers, and versions are untested. Use at your own discretion.
...more
Updated 1 week ago
