PromptBase
Close icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Hire
Create
Login
Sell
Explore
🤖 GPT

Opinion Article Critique

Opinion Article Critique gpt prompt mini thumbnail
9Eye icon
Views
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
Ever read articles that make points, and sound convincing, but you wonder what else you should consider? Or if the author is hiding important information? The Opinion Article Critique prompt will have AI provide the questions and critique you'll need to help you find this information. You input the article in question into the prompt, and ChatGPT will provide you with questions and thoughts to consider about the soundness of the article. It'll also point out any good points in the article.
...more
$2.99
Get prompt
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Over 1 month ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-3.5 (gpt-3.5-turbo)
Token size
226 ($0.00158 / call)
Example input
[""Source""]: The Motley Fool, [""Title""]: "4 Things Dave Ramsey is Dead Wrong About", [""Body""]: Dave Ramsey is one of the most popular financial gurus in the country, and his Baby Steps program has helped millions of people to take control of their finances. But while there are merits to much of his advice, there are a few things that Dave Ramsey is simply wrong about. Unfortunately, if you follow all of his advice you could end up getting into some financial trouble in the long run. Here are four of the key things Ramsey is wrong about that could lead you astray. Alert: highest cash back card we’ve seen now has 0% intro APR for 15 months. Learn more here. 1. S&P 500 returns Dave Ramsey has repeatedly insisted that you can expect to make a 12% return on your investments. He claims this is based on the "historic average annual return of the S&P 500." Here's the problem. This 12% figure is based on the simple average return of the S&P market between 1926 and 2019 -- not the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). While this may sound technical, here's what it means. More: Our picks for the best credit cards Let's say a $10,000 investment went up 25% one year and down 25% the next year. The simple average return would be 0%. But, in reality, your investment would've been down around 6.25%. Here's why: $10,000 + 25% of $10,000 = $12,500 $12,500 - 25% of $12,500 = $9,375 Dave's use of the simple average return of the S&P 500 makes it appear there was a 12.1% average annual return on the S&P because it doesn't take into account the actual annual growth of your money. Instead, the CAGR for that period, which is a better measure of how an investment actually grows over time, is 10.2% for the S&P 500. Unfortunately, if you base your retirement projections around Dave's assumption that you'll earn 12% per year instead of around 10% over time, you could find yourself with far less money than you expect. In fact, investing $5,000 per year for 30 years with an average annual gain of 12% would give you $1.21 million while investing the same amount at a 10% average annual gain would leave you with just $833,470. You can't afford to make an overly rosy assumption about how investments will perform when you're setting savings goals. 2. Mutual funds beat out ETFs Dave Ramsey recommends mutual funds rather than ETFs. An article on his website gives a number of justifications for this position including the following: Mutual funds are designed to be invested in over the long term rather than traded like ETFs You lose the "personal touch" that you'd get in an actively-managed mutual fund Choosing the right mutual fund allows you to beat the market Unfortunately, Ramsey casually dismisses the fact that ETFs tend to have much lower fees than mutual funds. And that matters. Investment fees cost you big time -- tens of thousands of dollars in lost returns over time, especially when investing on a long timeline. As far as losing the personal touch, the basics of mutual fund investing tells us that almost all actively-managed mutual funds fail to consistently outperform the stock market. Since there are multiple ETFs that aim to track the performance of the market as a whole, chances are good investing in one of those would provide better returns than an actively-managed fund. You also have the option to invest in ETFs for the long term if you want to. Nothing requires you to sell them just because you have the option to actively trade them. And while Ramsey's website suggests a growth stock mutual fund could be a smart way to outperform the market, there are plenty of growth ETFs to buy (often at lower fees). In fact, the best ETF brokers will have specialized niche ETFs you could explore if you hope to beat the market. There's no excuse to urge investors to pay higher investment fees for mutual funds that are likely to underperform when ETFs typically present a simpler, cheaper alternative. 3. Putting retirement savings before all debt payoff Ramsey is most famous for his "baby steps," which involve, in order: Saving up a small emergency fund Paying off all debt except your home Saving up three to six months of living expenses in an emergency fund Saving for retirement Saving for children's college Paying off your mortgage Building wealth and giving Taking these steps can be a smart move. But the idea that you should both pay off all debt except your home and save up a six-month emergency fund before you get serious about retirement savings is misguided. Some debt comes at a very low interest rate -- well below what you could earn in the stock market. Focusing on paying those types of loans off early could come as a huge lost opportunity, as you'd earn a lower rate of return on your money by putting it towards debt rather than into the market. It could also take you years to both pay off every dollar of debt and save up such a large emergency fund. In the meantime, you could be missing out on an employer match for retirement contributions and tax deductions for investing in a 401(k) or IRA. The sooner you start investing for retirement the better. So consider finding the right balance for what you do with your money. While paying off high-interest debt like credit cards can make sense before retirement investing, compare the interest rate on your loans with average market returns to see what's the best move. And once you have a starter emergency fund, consider splitting your extra cash between bulking that up and investing for your future. 4. You're better off living without credit Ramsey has repeatedly argued that you're better off not borrowing at all and that you can easily accomplish financial tasks -- such as renting an apartment or getting a mortgage -- without a credit score. The reality, however, is that most mortgage lenders, car loan providers, insurance companies, cell phone companies, utility companies, and landlords will look at your credit history. And while it's possible to find some that will overlook the fact you don't have one, you'll be narrowing your pool of potential lenders or landlords and making life a lot more difficult. Credit can (and should) be used as a tool. You can use it to make the best use of your money, such as when you borrow at a low interest rate for essential purchases while leaving your money invested. The best credit cards will even let you earn rewards, miles, or cash back for spending you'd do anyway while also getting the purchase protection that cards provide. Even if you don't want to use credit cards or borrow because you're afraid you can't handle debt responsibly, you can still use cards to build good credit. It's as simple as making one purchase a month and paying it off on time. You could do this easily by setting up a card to pay for your monthly Netflix subscription and then setting up autopay to ensure you pay off that balance in full. There's little reason to handicap your financial choices by leaving yourself without one of the key metrics that helps companies decide if they want to do business with you. So while there's nothing wrong with considering Ramsey's advice to help you make financial choices -- or even following some of it -- the bottom line is that you need to make your own independent choices. Ramsey is just one voice out there. So take the time to learn everything you can before making a decision about what's best for managing your money.
Example output
The author of the article, titled "Four Things Dave Ramsey is Dead Wrong About," seems to present a critical perspective on Dave Ramsey's financial advice. While acknowledging Ramsey's effectiveness in helping people get out of debt, the article challenges specific aspects of his advice post-debt, raising concerns about the applicability of Ramsey's guidance for everyone. Let's examine the critique and potential areas of concern. One point of contention is the advice on credit cards. The financial advisor, Anokye Miller, argues that while Ramsey discourages the use of credit cards, they can be valuable if used responsibly. This raises the question of whether Ramsey's blanket advice against credit cards is too rigid, ignoring potential benefits like building credit and earning rewards. Regarding Ramsey's debt repayment strategy, Doug Carey challenges the popular "debt snowball" method. He suggests that prioritizing smaller debts, as per Ramsey's method, may not be the most financially optimal strategy. This critique questions the effectiveness of Ramsey's approach, emphasizing the importance of considering interest rates in debt repayment. Michela Allocca challenges Ramsey's recommendation to delay investing until debt is fully paid off. She argues that this advice may overlook the long-term benefits of compound growth in the stock market, potentially resulting in missed investment opportunities. This criticism questions the trade-off between debt repayment and investment, challenging Ramsey's emphasis on paying off debt entirely before investing. Lastly, Jesse Cramer disputes Ramsey's preference for actively-managed mutual funds over passive ETFs, citing evidence that actively-managed funds rarely outperform passive ones. This raises doubts about the validity of Ramsey's claim that it's "fairly easy" to pick mutual funds that outperform, pointing to a potential lack of alignment with established investment principles. To evaluate the legitimacy of the author's point of view, one might ask: Is the critique based on solid evidence and established financial principles? Are there counterarguments or alternative perspectives that support Ramsey's advice? Does the author provide a balanced assessment of Ramsey's overall impact on personal finance, considering both strengths and weaknesses? Are the experts quoted in the article representative of a diverse range of opinions within the financial community? Is there any indication of bias or ulterior motives in the critique, such as promoting alternative financial strategies? By asking these questions, one can better evaluate the credibility and impartiality of the author's perspective on Dave Ramsey's financial advice.
Browse Marketplace