Prompt Details
Model
(claude-5-sonnet)
Token size
1,085
Example input
[COMPANY NAME AND WHAT IT DOES]: Flowdesk — automated invoice follow-up and payment collection for freelancers and small agencies
[STAGE AND FUNDING TARGET]: Pre-seed — targeting $500K
[SLIDE BY SLIDE OUTLINE OR FULL DECK COPY]: Problem: freelancers spend 4 hours per week on invoice follow-up. Solution: automated reminders and payment links. Market: $50B SMB invoicing market. Traction: 120 beta users, $3K MRR, 40% MoM growth. Team: 2 founders, one ex-Stripe, one designer. Ask: $500K for 18 months runway. No competitive slide. No business model slide.
[TARGET INVESTOR TYPE]: Seed-stage angels and micro VCs investing $25K-$250K checks
[KEY TRACTION AND METRICS]: 120 users | $3K MRR | 40% month-over-month growth | 0 churn in 3 months
Example output
=====================================
PITCH DECK AUDITOR v1.0
=====================================
COMPANY: Flowdesk — automated invoice follow-up for freelancers and small agencies
STAGE: Pre-seed — $500K target
INVESTOR: Seed-stage angels and micro VCs
OVERALL DECK SCORE
██████████████░░░░░░
Score: 71/100
CLOSE — One or two slides are killing an otherwise good story
-------------------------------------
SLIDE SCORES
-------------------------------------
Problem ████████░░ 8/10 Specific time cost is compelling — 4 hours is a number investors feel
Solution ████████░░ 8/10 Clear and simple — does one thing and explains it in one sentence
Market Size ██████░░░░ 6/10 $50B invoicing market is real but not segmented to actual TAM
Traction █████████░ 9/10 40% MoM growth and zero churn at pre-seed is genuinely impressive
Business Model ██████░░░░ 6/10 Not shown — investors will ask and you want to answer before they do
Team ████████░░ 8/10 Ex-Stripe credential is strong — lean into it harder
Ask █████░░░░░ 5/10 $500K ask with no use of funds breakdown raises allocation questions
Competitive Moat ██░░░░░░░░ 2/10 Missing entirely — most common reason for a pass at seed
-------------------------------------
INVESTOR OBJECTIONS (Answer These Before The Meeting)
-------------------------------------
Question: "What stops FreshBooks or QuickBooks from building this in a quarter?"
Comes from: Missing competitive moat slide
Current handling: Not addressed anywhere in the deck
Fix: Add a competitive moat slide explaining why incumbents will not solve this — they are invoicing platforms, not collections specialists. Their incentive is to make sending invoices easy, not to make collecting them aggressive.
Question: "How do you make money?"
Comes from: Missing business model slide
Current handling: Not shown at all
Fix: Add one slide: "$29/month freelancers, $79/month per seat for agencies. Current blended ARPU $34. Target $49 by month 12 through agency upsell."
Question: "Is $50B really your market?"
Comes from: Market size slide claiming full SMB invoicing market
Current handling: Overstated — you are not competing with all SMB invoicing
Fix: Reframe as bottoms-up TAM: "18M freelancers and small agencies in the US x $29/month = $6.3B addressable market."
Question: "Why are you the right team?"
Comes from: Team slide mentioning credentials without connecting them to the problem
Current handling: Ex-Stripe credential present but not contextualized
Fix: "Our ex-Stripe founder built the payments infrastructure processing $640B annually — and watched freelancers lose 15% of revenue to late payments. That is why we built this."
Question: "What does $500K actually buy you?"
Comes from: Ask slide with no use of funds breakdown
Current handling: Not specified
Fix: "18 months runway. $200K product — hire one senior engineer. $150K growth — paid acquisition testing. $150K operations. Milestone: $25K MRR by month 12."
-------------------------------------
SLIDE REWRITES
-------------------------------------
Slide: Competitive Moat (currently missing — must add)
Original: Not present
Rewritten:
WHY WE WIN
Incumbents (FreshBooks, QuickBooks, Wave) are invoicing platforms. Their incentive is making invoicing easy — adding aggressive follow-up sequences would mean admitting their invoicing is not enough.
Our moat:
Workflow depth: 14-step follow-up sequences that adapt to payment behavior — incumbents have 1-2 reminders
Integration layer: Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and bank transfers — incumbents lock to one processor
Network data: After 3,000 invoices, we know which follow-up cadences collect fastest by industry and invoice size — gets stronger with every user
Why this is stronger: Directly answers the most common seed objection before the investor raises it
Slide: Market Size
Original: "$50B SMB invoicing software market"
Rewritten:
Our market: 18M freelancers and small agencies in the US
Problem cost: $300B lost to late payment annually (Federal Reserve SMB data)
Flowdesk TAM: 18M businesses x $29/month = $6.3B US addressable market
We are not competing with invoicing software — we are solving the collections problem inside it
Why this is stronger: Bottoms-up TAM from actual user data is more credible than a market report at pre-seed
Slide: Ask
Original: "$500K — 18 months runway"
Rewritten:
THE ASK — $500K PRE-SEED
Product — $200K — hire one senior engineer, ship agency tier by month 6
Growth — $150K — test paid acquisition, target $15 CAC based on current organic payback period
Operations — $150K — 18 months founder salaries
Milestone: $25K MRR by month 12 (current 40% MoM growth puts us at $22K at flat rate)
Next raise: $2-3M seed when we hit $25K MRR with 3+ months of data
Why this is stronger: Investors want to know what their money does — use of funds with milestones shows you have thought past the close
-------------------------------------
NARRATIVE AUDIT
-------------------------------------
Beginning: Strong. "Freelancers spend 4 hours per week chasing invoices" is specific, relatable, and costly. Investors who have freelanced or hired freelancers feel this immediately. Score: 8/10.
Middle: Partial. Solution is clear, ex-Stripe credential is relevant, traction is excellent. What is missing is the connection between the specific team background and why they uniquely understand this problem — and the absence of a competitive moat slide leaves the "why will this last" question unanswered. Score: 6/10.
End: Weak. The ask exists but with no use of funds or milestone target, the investor ends the deck asking "what does $500K actually accomplish?" Score: 4/10.
Biggest narrative gap: The deck does not answer "why now?" Remote work exploded freelancing, faster payment rails made automation possible, and incumbent invoicing tools have not innovated in 10 years. Add one sentence that explains why 2025 is the right moment to build this — it closes the story.
-------------------------------------
WHAT TO PRACTICE
-------------------------------------
1. "What stops a big player from copying this?" — have a 60-second answer about moat depth and incumbent incentives ready before every meeting
2. "Walk me through your business model" — memorize: $29 freelancer, $79 agency per seat, $34 blended ARPU today, $49 target by month 12
3. "Why are you the right team?" — connect ex-Stripe background directly to the collections problem, not payments generally
4. "What does the $500K milestone look like?" — $25K MRR by month 12, enough data to raise a $2-3M seed round
5. "Who else are you talking to?" — prepare a comfortable answer that signals activity without manufactured urgency
=====================================
AUDIT COMPLETE — Pitch Deck Auditor v1.0
=====================================
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-SONNET
Most pitch decks get passed on in under 3 minutes — not because the business is wrong, but because the story is. This Claude prompt runs a full audit of any pitch deck and delivers: an overall score (0–100), slide-by-slide breakdown, the exact narrative gaps killing investor interest, a rewrite of your weakest slides, and a list of the questions your deck is leaving unanswered. Works for pre-seed, seed, and Series A decks targeting angels, VCs, or accelerators like Y Combinator.
...more
Updated 3 weeks ago
