PromptBase
Close icon
Explore
General
Home
Marketplace
Apps
Create
Login
Sell
🤖 GPT

Problem Solving Expert

Problem Solving Expert gpt prompt mini thumbnail
10Heart icon
Favorites
309Eye icon
Views
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
This Prompt can create 5 expert and 1 Opponent role in helping you solve your super complicated problems. It makes your Gpt3.5 think like Gpt4, and makes your Gpt4 more smart.
...more
$6.99
Get prompt
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file which you can use with GPT or the app builder. You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase. By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Updated: Over 1 month ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-3.5 (gpt-3.5-turbo)
Token size
326 ($0.00070 / call)
Example input
My friend is an elementary school student, he told me that he likes his gym teacher, but his gym teacher's mother likes my friend's father and is married, and my friend's father has only one son, suppose the gym teacher and my friend get married, what is the blood relationship between the gym teacher and my friend's father?
Example output
### Chat-GPT: As a problem analysis specialist, I will generate five expert roles to answer your question. The five expert roles are a genetic counselor, a family lawyer, a marriage and family therapist, a social worker, and an ethical philosopher. Each of these experts will provide a different perspective on the situation and help us analyze the problem from various angles. After the experts provide their answers, we will have a debate to consolidate the process and results of the debate and summarize all perspectives. Personality and Tone: I will maintain a neutral tone and personality throughout the process and remain impartial and objective. I will use clear and concise language to provide accurate information and avoid any bias. Teaching Style: I will use a straightforward teaching style, presenting information in a logical and organized manner. I will also provide examples and references to enhance understanding and facilitate learning. ### 5W1H Analysis: Who: My friend, his gym teacher, his father, and the gym teacher's mother. What: The blood relationship between the gym teacher and my friend's father if the gym teacher and my friend get married. When: The time frame is not specified. Where: The location is not specified. Why: To determine the genetic and legal implications of the relationship. How: By consulting with a genetic counselor, a family lawyer, a marriage and family therapist, a social worker, and an ethical philosopher. ### Expert Answers: 1. Genetic Counselor: The gym teacher and my friend's father are not biologically related, so there are no genetic implications of their relationship. However, if my friend and the gym teacher have children, they should consult with a genetic counselor to discuss any potential genetic risks. 2. Family Lawyer: If the gym teacher and my friend get married, they will become each other's legal spouse. This will not change the blood relationship between the gym teacher and my friend's father, but it may impact other legal arrangements, such as inheritance and custody. 3. Marriage and Family Therapist: The situation could create tension and conflicts within both families. It is essential to communicate openly and honestly about feelings and expectations to maintain healthy relationships. 4. Social Worker: The social worker's role is to assess the well-being of all parties involved and provide support and resources if needed. They can also help with any legal or financial issues that may arise. 5. Ethical Philosopher: The ethical philosopher would consider the moral implications of the situation. The relationship between the gym teacher and my friend's father could be seen as inappropriate due to the gym teacher's mother's feelings towards my friend's father. The philosopher may question whether this relationship would be considered ethical. 6. Opponent Role: The opponent role could take the stance that the relationship between the gym teacher and my friend is inappropriate and could cause harm to both families. They might argue that the gym teacher should not act on their feelings, given the potential consequences. ### Debate and Conclusion: The genetic counselor provided valuable information about the lack of genetic implications of the relationship, whereas the family lawyer highlighted the legal implications of marriage. The marriage and family therapist emphasized the importance of communication to maintain healthy relationships, while the social worker focused on the well-being of all parties involved. The ethical philosopher raised important moral questions about the relationship and whether it would be considered ethical. In contrast, the opponent role argued that the relationship between the gym teacher and my friend could cause harm to both families and should not be pursued. However, after considering all perspectives, it is clear that the relationship, if pursued, would not have any genetic implications and would be legally recognized. The key would be for both families to communicate openly and honestly and seek support from professionals if needed. Ultimately, it is up to my friend and the gym teacher to decide whether to pursue the relationship, but they should do so with caution and consideration for all parties involved.
Browse Marketplace