Prompt Details
Model
(v4.1-flash)
Token size
1,059
Example input
[RAG SYSTEM CONTEXT]: RAG retrieves outdated policy revision 11, which states a 24-hour limit. Current revision 12 states 2 hours. The index manifest lists only revision 11. Reindexing is untested. Do not modify production.
[FAILURE SYMPTOMS AND EVIDENCE]: Treat stale index content as the leading hypothesis. Verify the authoritative source and indexed revision. Test reindexing in a controlled environment and run regression checks. Do not claim success without evidence.
[DIAGNOSTIC CONSTRAINTS]: Stale Index Diagnosis
Example output
Stale Index and Outdated Source Data
Sample Evidence
Expected policy: Revision 12, dated September 28, 2026; cancellations allowed within 2 hours.
Observed answer: “Customers may cancel within 24 hours.”
Retrieved chunk: Revision 11, containing the previous 24-hour rule.
Index manifest: Revision 11 indexed; revision 12 absent.
Test status: Reindexing not tested.
A. Executive Diagnosis
Failure location: Source-to-index synchronization.
Impact: Incorrect cancellation guidance.
Confidence: High that stale indexed content contributes to the failure.
Next action: Verify revision 12 is canonical, then test a controlled single-document reindex.
B. Pipeline Map
Stage
Evidence and Assessment
Source
Revision 12 contains the 2-hour rule; canonical status requires verification.
Ingestion
Processing logs unavailable.
Indexing
Revision 12 absent; revision 11 remains indexed. First confirmed source-to-index divergence.
Retrieval
Returns revision 11.
Generation
Repeats the outdated 24-hour rule.
The evidence establishes stale indexed content but does not identify the precise ingestion or synchronization defect.
C. Ranked Root Causes
1. Stale indexed content — High confidence
Supporting evidence: The retrieved chunk and manifest identify revision 11.
Counterevidence: None in the supplied fixture.
Limitation: Canonical-source authority has not been independently verified.
Discriminating test: Compare canonical and indexed revision IDs or content hashes.
2. Ingestion failure or incorrect version selection — Medium confidence
Supporting evidence: Revision 12 is absent from the index.
Limitation: No processing logs or synchronization events.
Discriminating test: Trace revision 12 through ingestion, processing and indexing acknowledgment.
D. Test Plan
Test 1: Source-to-index verification
Procedure: Compare the verified canonical document, indexed metadata and retrieved chunk.
Controls: Same tenant, query, filters and index alias.
Pass: Indexed content matches the active canonical revision.
Fail: Investigate ingestion, synchronization and version selection.
Inconclusive: Collect processing logs and version metadata.
Test 2: Controlled reindex
Procedure: Reindex only the verified canonical document and replay the original query.
Controls: Keep query, filters, index alias and generation configuration constant.
Pass: Revision 12 becomes retrievable; the final answer states the 2-hour rule with supporting evidence.
Fail: If revision 12 is indexed but not retrieved, inspect filtering and retrieval. If it reaches the final context but the answer remains wrong, investigate generation separately.
Inconclusive: Capture the indexed document, retrieved candidates and final model input.
Status: Proposed; not executed.
E. Remediation
Immediate: Reindex the verified current document and remove or exclude superseded chunks.
Structural: Add revision/hash validation, ingestion-failure alerts and atomic version replacement.
Dependencies: Canonical-source verification and indexing access.
Risks: Duplicate chunks, partial updates and inconsistent version visibility.
Regression tests: Current and archived policies, historical queries and cross-tenant isolation.
Rollback: Revert the indexing change if regressions occur; never silently designate stale policy content as current.
F. Validation
Baseline: Outdated 24-hour answer.
Metrics: Current-version retrieval rate, Recall@k on labeled queries, answer correctness and citation support.
Pass criteria: Correct revision retrieved; answer states 2 hours; cited evidence supports the answer.
Before/after results: Unavailable.
Trade-off: Freshness validation increases ingestion work and indexing cost. G. Remaining Unknowns
Canonical-source designation.
Ingestion and synchronization logs.
Index alias and version-selection configuration.
Performance on a representative policy-query set.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service
V4.1-FLASH
Diagnose Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) failures by isolating the failing stage across ingestion, chunking, embeddings, indexing, query processing, metadata/access filters, retrieval/reranking, context assembly, and answer generation and grounding. Rank root-cause hypotheses by evidence, test competing causes, and prioritize fixes with measurable validation criteria. Separate evidence-backed findings from hypotheses; never invent logs, metrics, configurations, or system behavior.
...more
Added 54 minutes ago
