Below is the structured filing-readiness review using only the supplied requirement basis and supplied matter materials. No additional U.S. trademark filing requirements have been introduced. ## FILING READINESS MATRIX | Requirement / Information Item | Status | Requirement Basis | Supporting Source | Issue / Gap | Human Confirmation | Notes | | ---------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Registration number | PRESENT | Supplied Section 8 checklist requires registration number | Matter information; Draft Section 8 declaration | None identified | No | Registration No. 9,214,638 is supplied and the draft declaration is identified as the filing document. | | Current owner name | PRESENT | Supplied Section 8 checklist requires current owner name | Matter information; Draft Section 8 declaration | None identified | No | Owner of record and declaration both identify **Lumenridge Kitchenware LLC**. | | Current owner address | PRESENT | Supplied Section 8 checklist requires current owner address | Client-supplied current owner information; internal registration-management record | None identified | No | Address supplied as **1840 Market Ridge Drive, Denver, CO 80202, USA** and stated to match the registration-management record. | | Verified statement of use | UNKNOWN | Supplied Section 8 checklist requires a verified statement of use | Draft Section 8 declaration; supplied current filing basis | The supplied description confirms a draft declaration and a continued-use basis, but does not provide or expressly identify the exact verified-statement language | Yes | Whether the declaration contains the required verified statement in acceptable form requires review of the actual declaration text. | | Goods/services currently in use — Class 21 list | PRESENT | Supplied checklist requires a list of goods/services currently in use | Current Class 21 goods list; supplied current filing basis | None as to presence of the list | Yes | Listed goods are cookware; non-electric cooking utensils; kitchen containers. The assertion that all are currently in use should be separately confirmed. | | Continued-use representation for all listed Class 21 goods | REQUIRES HUMAN CONFIRMATION | Supplied current filing basis states continued use in commerce for all listed Class 21 goods; checklist states goods/services no longer in use should not be maintained | Supplied current filing basis; 2026 customer invoices; product-page screenshots | Supporting evidence expressly identified for cookware and kitchen containers; no separately identified use evidence for non-electric cooking utensils | Yes | The supplied materials do not establish, by themselves, the legal or factual supportability of the continued-use representation for every listed good. | | Specimen — one specimen for Class 21 | PRESENT | Supplied checklist requires one specimen for each class | Photograph of LUMENRIDGE-branded cookware packaging showing the mark and product identification | None as to specimen presence | Yes | One Class 21 specimen is supplied. Acceptability/sufficiency of the specimen remains a human review matter. | | Filing fee — per class | PRESENT | Supplied checklist requires filing fee per class | Client billing record | None identified in the supplied record | No | Record identifies one class and states that the filing fee has been approved for payment. | | Signed and dated verification | PRESENT | Supplied checklist requires signed/dated verification | Signature page | None as to presence of signature page and date | Yes | Signature page is present and dated **October 28, 2026**. Signatory authority or legal sufficiency is not established by the supplied description. | | Goods/services no longer in use should not be maintained | REQUIRES HUMAN CONFIRMATION | Explicit condition in supplied Section 8 checklist | Current filing basis; invoices; product-page screenshots | All three listed goods are represented as in use, but the supplied evidence does not separately establish use for each listed good | Yes | Requires confirmation of the underlying use/nonuse facts before maintaining the full Class 21 identification. | | Owner information consistency | PRESENT | Review against supplied registration-management information; current owner information supplied | Registration/matter information; client current-owner record; internal portfolio review record | No conflict identified | No | Owner name is consistent; supplied address is stated to match the registration-management record. | | Ownership-change record | NOT APPLICABLE | Matter record states no ownership-change documents are identified and current owner is identified as owner of record | Matter information; prior/supporting records | No ownership-change issue identified for the supplied matter | No | No ownership-change documentation is identified for comparison. | | Prior Section 8 filing comparison | NOT APPLICABLE | Matter record states no prior Section 8 filing has been made | Prior/supporting records | No prior Section 8 filing is available for comparison | No | Prior-filing consistency comparison cannot be performed because no prior Section 8 filing exists. | | Registration certificate | PRESENT | Supporting record supplied for matter review | Registration certificate | None identified | No | Registration certificate is supplied as a supporting record. | | Conflicting correspondence / docket notes | PRESENT | Relevant supporting-record consistency review | Supporting records | No conflicting correspondence or docket notes currently identified | No | Record states that no conflicting correspondence or docket notes are currently identified. | | Target filing date | PRESENT | Matter-specific target date supplied; checklist states filing window is between fifth and sixth anniversaries | Matter information; supplied filing checklist | None identified from the supplied dates | No | Target date supplied as **November 18, 2026**. Based on the supplied registration date and stated five-to-six-year filing window, the target falls within that stated period. | ## OUTSTANDING ITEMS **Requires human confirmation** The principal substantive review dependency is the continued-use representation for all Class 21 goods. The supplied package identifies evidence for **cookware** and **kitchen containers**, but no separately identified use evidence for **non-electric cooking utensils**. This does not establish that the latter is not in use; it means the supplied evidence does not independently resolve that review point. The actual text of the **verified statement of use** should also be reviewed. The package description identifies a draft Section 8 declaration and a continued-use basis, but does not reproduce the declaration's statement language. The **specimen** is present, but its acceptability and sufficiency remain subject to human professional review. Likewise, the presence of a signed and dated verification is established, but the supplied materials do not establish signatory authority or other substantive sufficiency. **No missing requirement-based package item is identified.** Each item expressly required by the supplied checklist has a corresponding supplied material or identified information source. That observation should not be treated as a determination that the filing package is legally complete, legally sufficient, compliant, or ready for filing. **No material inconsistency is identified** among the supplied owner information and supporting records. No prior Section 8 filing exists for comparison, and no conflicting correspondence or docket notes are identified. **Requirement-verification dependency:** none is identified for the requirements actually used in this matrix; the checklist supplied with the matter provides the requirement basis used for the review.