🎯 Core Clash: Group members are clashing over research workload. The root cause is executive dysfunction and linear fatigue conflicting with structural design. 🧱 Boundary Grid: | Person | Domain | Hard Limit | Schedule | Fallback Rule | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Strategist | Structural Map & Packages | No clerical data entry | Day 1 to Day 3 | If packages are vague, the Operator can pause execution. | | Operator | Data Tallying & Documenting | No blueprint architecture | Day 4 to Day 14 | If data is missing, the Leader must request an extension. | | Leader | Project Management & Reporting | No micromanagement of design | Ongoing | If deadlines slip, the Leader reallocates packages. | ⚠️ Friction Risks: * Risk: Pride blocks communication when boundaries break. Fix: Revert strictly to the pre-cooked fallback rule automatically without hosting a live feedback debate. ✅ Path to the Desired Ending: 1. Isolate the global strategic structure on Day 1. 2. Delegate modular work packages directly to operators based on technical capability. 3. Establish rigid fallback boundaries to keep team pride insulated from daily operations.