PUBLICATION style, clean significant result (RCT) Input results: STUDY DESIGN: randomized controlled trial Independent samples t-test comparing systolic blood pressure between treatment group (n=45, M=128.4, SD=9.2) and control group (n=43, M=134.1, SD=8.7). t(86)=2.94, p=0.004. Cohen's d=0.63, 95% CI [1.8, 9.6] mmHg difference. Output: Narrative write-up: Participants receiving the treatment showed significantly lower systolic blood pressure (M=128.4, SD=9.2, n=45) compared to controls (M=134.1, SD=8.7, n=43), t(86)=2.94, p=0.004, d=0.63, 95% CI [1.8, 9.6] mmHg. This represents a medium-to-large effect size. Wording accuracy check: Since this is a randomized controlled trial, causal language (e.g. "the treatment reduced blood pressure") is appropriate here, unlike in observational designs. Effect size and CI were reported alongside the p-value, which is correct practice — no overclaiming detected. What's missing: Consider reporting whether this was a primary or secondary outcome, and whether multiple-comparisons correction was applied if other outcomes were also tested.