# WORK INSTRUCTION → SOURCE-TO-STEP TECHNICAL ACCURACY & CONSISTENCY REVIEW Industrial Manufacturing · Technical Documentation QA · Draft Work Instruction Review ## Review disposition LIMITED REVIEW The supplied draft and source excerpts permit substantive comparison of all four procedural steps. However, the component designation discrepancy, torque discrepancy, and unavailable drawing details require human review before the affected instructions can be accepted. Draft steps accounted for ## 4 of 4 Material findings requiring review ## 3 Validation status VALIDATED\* \*Structural and evidence-integrity checks passed for the defined review scope. This does not establish technical correctness, engineering approval, safety, or release readiness. ## A. Review scope and input status ### 1. Draft identification | Field | Supplied information | | --------------------- | --------------------------- | | Document title | Sensor Bracket Installation | | Document ID | WI-AX17-014 | | Revision | Draft 0 | | Equipment | AX-17 Assembly Fixture | | Applicability | AX-17 fixture assembly | | Steps in review scope | Steps 1–4 | ### 2. Source inventory and coverage | Source | Identification and revision | Reviewed material | Coverage and limitations | | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Source 1 | AX-17 Assembly Specification, SPEC-AX17-006, Revision C | Section 4.2 — Sensor Support Bracket Installation | Supplied excerpt reviewed; the complete specification was not provided. | | Source 2 | AX-17 Assembly Drawing, DWG-AX17-022, Revision C | Detail B — Sensor Support Bracket | Supplied drawing information reviewed; complete drawing annotations and dimensions were unavailable. | The comparison is based on the draft, specification excerpt, and drawing information supplied in the review scenario.  Teks yang ditempel (1).txt Source-control limitations - Source 1 identifies the applicable equipment as the AX-17 Assembly Fixture. - Revision identifiers are present, but revision currency and approval status have not been independently verified. - Applicability and approval status of the complete source documents have not been independently established. - No organization-defined source-priority rule was supplied. - No cross-reference establishing whether `PB-14` is an approved alias or alternative designation for `SB-14` was provided. Review readiness: LIMITED REVIEW. The supplied evidence is sufficient to identify specific discrepancies, but not to settle all component-identity and installation-orientation questions. ## B. Source-to-Step Verification Matrix The matrix follows the required seven-column order. Compound steps are decomposed into separate, material claims so that a supported detail does not conceal an unresolved discrepancy.  Teks yang ditempel (1).txt | STEP | CLAIM/ACTION | SOURCE EVIDENCE | MATCH STATUS | CONFLICT | MISSING SUPPORT | REVIEW FLAG | | -------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Step 1 | Component is identified as sensor mounting plate (PB-14). | Source 1, SPEC-AX17-006 Rev C, §4.2: sensor support bracket identified as `SB-14`. Source 2, DWG-AX17-022 Rev C, Detail B: component designation `SB-14`. | CONFLICTING | Draft designation `PB-14` differs from the `SB-14` designation in both supplied sources. | An authoritative component cross-reference, BOM, or other appropriate evidence confirming whether the identifiers refer to the same component. | REVIEW REQUIRED — potential wrong-component or component-designation issue. Physical identity cannot yet be conclusively determined. | | Step 1 | Position the component against the designated frame slots. | Source 1, §4.2: the sensor support bracket `SB-14` shall be positioned against the designated frame slots. | PARTIALLY SUPPORTED | The positioning action is supported for `SB-14`; the identity of the draft's `PB-14` remains unresolved. | Evidence linking the draft's named component to the source-identified bracket. | REVIEW REQUIRED — the action is supported only for the component identified by the source. | | Step 2 | Install two M6 × 16 screws. | Source 1, §4.2: secure the bracket using two M6 × 16 screws. Source 2, Detail B: `2 × M6 × 16 screws`. | SUPPORTED | NO CONFLICT IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for screw count and specification. | NO SUPPORT GAP IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for the screw count and specification. Application to `PB-14` remains dependent on resolving Step 1. | INFORMATIONAL for the fastener specification; Step 1's component-identity finding remains open. | | Step 2 | Use one flat washer for each screw. | Source 1, §4.2: one flat washer per screw. Source 2, Detail B: two flat washers, one for each screw. | SUPPORTED | NO CONFLICT IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for washer quantity and arrangement. | NO SUPPORT GAP IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for the washer configuration. Application to `PB-14` remains dependent on resolving Step 1. | INFORMATIONAL for the washer configuration; Step 1's component-identity finding remains open. | | Step 3 | Tighten both screws to 8 N·m. | Source 1, §4.2: tighten both screws to a torque of 10 N·m. No torque value appears in the supplied Source 2 drawing information. | CONFLICTING | Draft specifies `8 N·m`; Source 1 specifies `10 N·m`. The difference is material and must not be silently normalized. | Confirmation of the governing torque value and its authoritative source. The supplied drawing information does not independently corroborate the draft's 8 N·m value. | REVIEW REQUIRED — unresolved torque discrepancy. Governing source authority also requires confirmation. | | Step 4 | Confirm that the mounting plate sits flush against the frame. | Source 1, §4.2: the sensor support bracket shall sit flush against the frame. | PARTIALLY SUPPORTED | The flush condition matches the source requirement for `SB-14`; application to the draft's `PB-14` remains unresolved. | Confirmation of component identity or a documented relationship between `PB-14` and `SB-14`. | REVIEW REQUIRED — final-condition evidence is available for the source-identified bracket, but applicability to the draft's named component is unconfirmed. | | Step 4 | Confirm that the sensor cable exits toward the rear of the fixture. | Source 1, §4.2: sensor cable exits toward the rear of the fixture. Source 2, Detail B information: cable exit direction is the rear of the fixture. | SUPPORTED | NO CONFLICT IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for the stated cable exit direction. The unresolved component designation still affects applicability to the draft. | NO SUPPORT GAP IDENTIFIED WITHIN REVIEWED SCOPE for the rearward direction itself. Component identity and the full drawing-defined orientation remain separate unresolved matters. | INFORMATIONAL for the stated direction; see the component-identity and orientation findings. | | G-01 — reported coverage gap; not an existing draft step | Whether the work instruction sufficiently specifies the required bracket installation orientation. | Source 2, DWG-AX17-022 Rev C, Detail B: installation orientation is to refer to Detail B. The supplied drawing information contains no additional annotations or dimensions. | INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE | UNDETERMINED. The available material does not establish whether the draft omits a material orientation requirement or whether its existing wording is sufficient. | Readable Detail B, including the applicable orientation annotations and any necessary interpretation by an authorized technical reviewer. | REVIEW REQUIRED — orientation coverage cannot be fully verified from the supplied drawing information. | ### Interpretation notes 1\. Component identity is unresolved. The evidence establishes a designation discrepancy between `PB-14` in the draft and `SB-14` in both sources. It does not establish whether `PB-14` is an alias, a separate component, or a drafting error. Therefore, this report flags a potential wrong-component issue without asserting that the wrong physical component has definitively been selected. 2\. The torque value is an explicit discrepancy. The draft's 8 N·m value differs from the 10 N·m value in the supplied specification. The fact that the drawing excerpt does not state a torque value does not resolve or independently corroborate this discrepancy. 3\. Supported details remain scoped. The fastener configuration and rear cable exit direction match the supplied source information. Their presence does not resolve the separate component-designation question. ## C. Candidate missing-step and coverage findings ### G-01 — Installation-orientation coverage Classification: POTENTIAL COVERAGE GAP The supplied drawing information directs the reader to Detail B for the bracket installation orientation. The draft specifies positioning against designated frame slots and a rearward cable exit, but the supplied material is insufficient to determine whether these statements capture the complete orientation requirements. This is not a confirmed missing step. The actual drawing annotations, dimensions, and orientation details were not provided. Required follow-up: Review the complete applicable Detail B and compare its orientation requirements with Steps 1 and 4. Do not invent an alternative orientation instruction. No additional source-supported candidate omission is established by the reviewed excerpt. This is a scoped finding, not a claim that all potentially relevant source documents have been examined. ## D. Source conflicts and unresolved questions | Finding | Affected step(s) | Evidence or limitation | Required clarification | | ------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Component designation discrepancy | Steps 1 and 4; potentially the application of Step 2 | Draft uses `PB-14`; specification and drawing identify `SB-14`. | Confirm the intended component using an appropriate authoritative component reference. | | Torque discrepancy | Step 3 | Draft specifies 8 N·m; specification specifies 10 N·m. | Confirm the governing torque requirement and applicable source status with the appropriate technical authority. | | Installation orientation cannot be fully verified | Steps 1 and 4 | Drawing information refers to Detail B, but its actual annotations and dimensions are unavailable. | Examine the complete Detail B and verify the draft's orientation coverage. | Source-priority status: PRIORITY REQUIRES DOMAIN CONFIRMATION. No organization-defined source-priority rule was supplied, and the approval status and revision currency of the source documents have not been independently checked. The documented differences can be identified now, but unresolved source-control questions must not be settled merely by assuming that one document type is universally superior. ## E. Human review summary The review identifies three material issues requiring human attention: 1. Component designation: Establish whether the intended component is `SB-14`, whether `PB-14` has a documented relationship to it, or whether the draft references a different component. 2. Torque specification: Resolve the 8 N·m versus 10 N·m discrepancy against the appropriate authoritative technical requirement. 3. Installation orientation: Examine the complete drawing Detail B to determine whether the work instruction adequately captures the required orientation. The fastener configuration and rear cable exit direction match the supplied evidence. The flush condition and positioning action also match the specification for `SB-14`, but their application to the draft's `PB-14` remains conditional on resolving component identity. No numerical risk score or safety determination has been assigned. The available evidence does not establish whether any finding constitutes an immediate safety hazard. Human-review disposition: REVIEW REQUIRED. This report does not authorize execution of the procedure or establish that the work instruction is ready for approval or release. ## F. Validation status Draft-step coverage All four supplied draft steps were accounted for, and compound steps were separated into material claims where necessary. Evidence traceability Findings identify the supplied document IDs, revisions, and available section or drawing-detail locators. No page numbers, missing annotations, or approval metadata were invented. Classification and conflict handling Supported claims are separated from conflicting claims and insufficient evidence. The potential orientation gap is not presented as a confirmed omission. Outstanding limitations Component identity, governing torque, complete drawing orientation, and source-control status remain unresolved. Validation status Structural and evidence-integrity checks for the stated scope VALIDATED The report is validated for its defined, excerpt-based review scope. The unresolved technical findings remain open for human review; validation does not establish that the work instruction is technically correct, safe, compliant, approved, or released.  Teks yang ditempel (1).txt Final disposition: Preserve the draft as unapproved in this review context. Resolve the component designation and torque discrepancy, examine the complete installation-orientation evidence, and have the appropriate technical authority determine the required disposition. No modification, approval, or release of the source work instruction has been performed.