# Impact Report: Community Tutoring Project ## Project Context Summary Project: community tutoring project. Reporting period: to confirm. Target group: students receiving community tutoring support. Activities delivered: 40 tutoring sessions. Reach: 25 students supported. Attendance: 80 percent average attendance. Reported outcome: 18 students reported feeling more confident in maths. Evidence sources to confirm: attendance records, student feedback forms, tutor notes, parent/carer feedback, school partner feedback, and consent for any stories or quotes. ## Executive Impact Summary The community tutoring project delivered 40 tutoring sessions for 25 students, with average attendance of 80 percent. Feedback suggests the project contributed to improved maths confidence, with 18 students reporting that they felt more confident in maths after taking part. The project provided consistent learning support, created a structured space for practice, and helped identify practical lessons for future delivery. Longer-term academic outcomes would need follow-up evidence from assessment data, school feedback, or continued learner tracking. ## Need or Challenge Addressed The project responded to the need for accessible maths support outside regular classroom time. Students may need additional practice, encouragement, and individual attention to build confidence. Evidence of local need, referral routes, school feedback, or baseline confidence data should be added where available. ## Activities and Delivery Summary The project delivered: - 40 tutoring sessions - support for 25 students - regular maths practice - tutor-guided learning activities - attendance monitoring - student confidence feedback collection Delivery details to confirm: - session length - location - tutor roles - curriculum or topic coverage - referral or selection method - safeguarding arrangements - accessibility support ## Outputs and Reach Confirmed outputs: - 40 tutoring sessions delivered - 25 students supported - 80 percent average attendance Output interpretation: The attendance rate suggests consistent engagement for many participants, subject to verification of attendance records and reporting period. ## Outcomes and Impact Reported outcome: 18 students reported feeling more confident in maths. Impact interpretation: This suggests a positive self-reported confidence outcome among participating students. The claim should be framed as reported confidence improvement rather than proven academic attainment improvement unless test scores, school assessment data, or independent evaluation evidence is available. Possible outcome wording: “Students reported increased confidence in maths, with 18 participants saying they felt more confident after taking part.” Further evidence to strengthen the outcome: - baseline and follow-up confidence survey - school feedback - tutor observations - parent/carer feedback - attendance by student - attainment or assessment data, if appropriate and consented ## Metrics and Evidence Summary Metric: tutoring sessions delivered. Result: 40. Evidence source: delivery log to confirm. What it shows: project activity volume. Limitation: does not by itself prove learning outcomes. Metric: students supported. Result: 25. Evidence source: participant register to confirm. What it shows: project reach. Limitation: should be checked against consent, safeguarding, and data handling rules. Metric: average attendance. Result: 80 percent. Evidence source: attendance records to confirm. What it shows: engagement level. Limitation: average may hide variation by student or session. Metric: students reporting increased maths confidence. Result: 18 students. Evidence source: student feedback forms to confirm. What it shows: self-reported confidence outcome. Limitation: self-reported outcome does not prove attainment improvement without additional evidence. ## Beneficiary, Participant, or Stakeholder Stories Story section placeholder: Use anonymized stories only where consent is confirmed. Example structure: “One student joined the project needing extra confidence with maths practice. Through regular sessions and tutor support, they became more willing to attempt questions and ask for help. Their feedback stated that they felt more confident by the end of the programme.” Consent note: Confirm permission before using direct quotes, names, photos, school details, or identifiable information. ## Partnerships and Contribution Notes Potential contributors to describe: - tutors - school or community referral partners - parents/carers - volunteers - funders - venue partners Add specific partner names only where approved. ## Lessons Learned - Regular attendance tracking helped show engagement. - Confidence feedback provided useful early outcome evidence. - Future reports would be stronger with baseline and follow-up measures. - More detail on session content would help explain what worked. - Additional stakeholder feedback from tutors, parents/carers, or schools could strengthen the evidence base. ## Challenges, Limitations, and Risk Notes - Academic attainment impact has not been evidenced in the information provided. - Confidence data appears self-reported and should be presented honestly. - Reporting period is missing. - Consent status for stories, quotes, or photos is not confirmed. - Safeguarding and data protection review may be required because the project involves students. ## Future Plans and Sustainability Recommended next steps: - confirm reporting period - collect baseline and follow-up confidence data - gather tutor and school feedback - track attendance by session - document session topics - add anonymized participant stories with consent - explore continued support or follow-on sessions ## Stakeholder Summary or Funder Update Version The community tutoring project delivered 40 tutoring sessions and supported 25 students, achieving an average attendance rate of 80 percent. Student feedback suggests the project contributed to improved maths confidence, with 18 students reporting that they felt more confident after taking part. Future reporting will be strengthened by adding baseline data, tutor observations, school feedback, and anonymized participant stories with confirmed consent. ## Visual, Appendix, and Evidence Suggestions Suggested visuals: - headline metrics panel showing 40 sessions, 25 students, 80 percent attendance, and 18 students reporting increased confidence - short delivery timeline - anonymized student journey, with consent - quote box, only if quote and consent are confirmed Suggested appendices: - attendance summary - feedback form summary - evaluation method note - safeguarding/privacy statement - tutor reflection summary ## Final Impact Report QA Checklist - Reporting period is confirmed. - Metrics are verified against records. - Activities are separated from outcomes. - Impact claims are proportionate. - Evidence sources are listed. - Beneficiary stories are anonymized. - Consent is confirmed for quotes or photos. - Limitations are disclosed. - Lessons learned are included. - Future plans are realistic. - Funder or stakeholder requirements are checked. - Final review is completed before publication. ## Disclaimer This impact report is project reporting, stakeholder communication, and document-quality support. It does not provide audit assurance, evaluation certification, legal advice, financial advice, tax advice, charity governance advice, safeguarding approval, research ethics approval, data protection approval, public benefit confirmation, funder approval, or independent verification of outcomes. Verify all metrics, stories, quotes, consent, evidence, financials, reporting requirements, and publication permissions before submission or publication.