Skill Details
Runtime
(gpt-5.6)
Example user message
[userMessage]: Design a reliable multi-agent workflow for my marketing agency. I want these agents: 1. Research Agent 2. Strategy Agent 3. Copywriting Agent 4. Visual Prompt Agent 5. QA Agent 6. Client Delivery Agent Research Agent collects customer, competitor, and market information. Strategy uses the research to create campaign strategy. Copywriting uses the approved strategy. Visual Prompt creates image-generation prompts. QA checks everything. Client Delivery prepares the final package. I want to avoid context loss, Strategy working from weak research, copywriters inventing facts, endless QA loops, and delivery before approval.
Example agent response
# Multi-Agent Handoff Architecture
## Executive Summary
Recommended topology:
Research
→ Research Validation
→ Strategy
→ Strategy Approval
→ Copy + Visual Prompt
→ QA
→ Human Approval
→ Client Delivery
The proposed six-agent system is viable, but direct sequential handoffs would create three major risks:
1. Weak research propagating into strategy.
2. Copy and visual agents receiving different interpretations.
3. QA repeatedly rewriting work without convergence.
Production Status:
READY WITH CONDITIONS
---
## Agent Registry
### A1 — Research Agent
Responsibility:
Produce evidence-backed campaign research.
May:
Collect and structure verified information.
May Not:
Create final strategy.
Invent unsupported customer facts.
Output:
RESEARCH_BRIEF
---
### A2 — Strategy Agent
Responsibility:
Convert approved research into campaign strategy.
May Not:
Replace missing research with assumptions presented as facts.
Input:
APPROVED RESEARCH_BRIEF
Output:
STRATEGY_BRIEF
---
### A3 — Copywriting Agent
Responsibility:
Create campaign copy from approved strategy.
May Not:
Change target audience, offer, campaign promise, or factual claims.
---
### A4 — Visual Prompt Agent
Responsibility:
Translate approved creative direction into image-generation instructions.
May Not:
Create a different campaign strategy.
---
### A5 — QA Agent
Responsibility:
Validate contract compliance.
May:
Reject specific defects.
May Not:
Rewrite valid work or redesign approved strategy.
---
### A6 — Client Delivery Agent
Responsibility:
Package approved artifacts.
May Not:
Modify substantive content.
May Not:
Deliver without final approval.
---
## Primary Artifact Chain
RESEARCH_BRIEF
→ STRATEGY_BRIEF
→ COPY_PACKAGE + VISUAL_PACKAGE
→ QA_REPORT
→ APPROVAL_RECORD
→ CLIENT_PACKAGE
---
## Research → Strategy Handoff
Required Fields:
• Business objective
• Target audience evidence
• Competitor observations
• Market findings
• Source references
• Known unknowns
• Unsupported assumptions
Acceptance Criteria:
• Required sections complete
• Important claims sourced
• Contradictory evidence identified
• Unverified assumptions clearly labeled
Hard Gate:
HG-2 SOURCE GROUNDING FAILURE
If evidence supporting a major strategic claim is absent:
HANDOFF BLOCKED.
Strategy Agent must not compensate by inventing facts.
---
## Strategy → Copy Handoff
Context Package:
MUST KNOW
• Campaign objective
• Target audience
• Core proposition
• Messaging hierarchy
• Approved claims
• CTA
• Restrictions
MAY KNOW
• Selected supporting research
DO NOT NEED
• Full raw research conversation
• Rejected strategic alternatives
This reduces context pollution.
---
## Strategy → Visual Handoff
Visual Agent receives the same approved strategy version as Copywriting.
Artifact Reference:
STRATEGY_BRIEF v1.0 APPROVED
This prevents copy and visual production from diverging.
---
## Parallel Execution
After strategy approval:
Copywriting Agent
and
Visual Prompt Agent
may operate in parallel.
Neither depends on the other's draft.
Both depend on the same approved strategy.
---
## QA Gate
QA checks:
Copy:
• Strategy alignment
• Unsupported claims
• CTA compliance
• Required deliverables
Visual:
• Strategy alignment
• Product consistency
• Required format
• Brand restrictions
QA does not perform subjective rewrites without a contract violation.
---
## Defect Rules
S1 Minor:
Targeted repair only.
S2 Material:
Return affected artifact only.
S3 Critical:
Block workflow.
Example:
Copy has unsupported statistics.
Return Copy only.
Do not rerun:
Research
Strategy
Visual
unless the defect originates upstream.
---
## QA Loop Control
Maximum QA revision cycles:
2
Cycle 1:
Targeted repair.
Cycle 2:
Final repair.
If the same S2/S3 defect remains after cycle 2:
ESCALATE TO HUMAN.
No third automatic QA loop.
---
## Human Approval
Required before:
CLIENT_DELIVERY
Human receives:
• Strategy summary
• Final copy
• Visual prompts
• QA result
• Outstanding assumptions
Approval options:
APPROVE
REQUEST TARGETED REVISION
REJECT
---
## State Machine
INTAKE
→ RESEARCH
→ RESEARCH_VALIDATION
→ STRATEGY
→ STRATEGY_APPROVAL
→ PRODUCTION
→ QA
→ HUMAN_APPROVAL
→ DELIVERY
→ COMPLETED
Failure paths:
RESEARCH_VALIDATION
→ RESEARCH_REVISION
QA
→ TARGETED_REVISION
Retry exhausted
→ ESCALATED
Critical unresolved defect
→ FAILED_SAFE
---
## Critical Architecture Rule
Client Delivery Agent receives only APPROVED artifacts.
It cannot convert DRAFT or REVISION_REQUIRED artifacts into FINAL status.
---
## Production Recommendation
READY WITH CONDITIONS
Required controls:
1. Add evidence gate before Strategy.
2. Use one approved Strategy artifact as source of truth.
3. Limit QA to two cycles.
4. Restrict QA from rewriting valid work.
5. Require human approval before delivery.
6. Version all strategy-dependent artifacts.
Get this skill + 9 more with SelectFrom $14/mo · Cancel anytimeFrom $14/mo · Cancel anytime
View SelectBy purchasing this skill, you agree to our terms of service
GPT-5.6
Design reliable multi-agent workflows with explicit handoff contracts, role boundaries, state transitions, validation gates, retry limits, escalation rules, and human approval. This skill uses the RACER framework to prevent context loss, duplicate work, cascading errors, endless QA loops, and unsafe authority transfer. It produces agent contracts, handoff schemas, dependency maps, failure paths, termination rules, and a production-ready orchestration blueprint.
...more
Added 4 weeks ago
