A. Audit disposition and scope Disposition: INSUFFICIENT_INPUT I am unable to create a substantive requirement-to-test mapping because the provided materials only include a PR identifier and a statement that the CI is "green." I do not have access to the external PR or CI system. B. Input inventory Item Status PR identifier #1842 Mentioned by the user; identifier only, no diff provided Statement that CI is "green" USER-REPORTED EVIDENCE; no report details included Readable diff/change context NOT PROVIDED IN SUPPLIED MATERIALS Acceptance criteria / requirement NOT PROVIDED IN SUPPLIED MATERIALS Test source, test-level results, and logs NOT PROVIDED IN SUPPLIED MATERIALS C. Requirement-to-test map CANNOT_ASSESS. Without the change context and a basis for evaluation, I cannot link test evidence to acceptance criteria or conclude what has been verified. D. Evidence ledger Local ID Evidence What it supports Limitation E-01 User statement that CI is "green" Indicates only that the user reported this status No CI record, scope check, test list, commit SHA, or output available for review E. Verification-gap register Local Gap ID Gap What remains unverified Next check Priority GAP-01 Diff not provided The scope of changes to be assessed Provide a readable PR diff or representation of the changes UNASSESSED GAP-02 Acceptance criteria not provided The basis for assessing test adequacy Provide the applicable requirements/acceptance criteria UNASSESSED GAP-03 CI details and test evidence not provided Which tests were run, results per test/job, and their connection to the changes Provide test reports/CI details linked to the commit under review UNASSESSED F. Follow-up checks and human-review questions Please provide: 1. A readable diff for PR #1842. 2. The acceptance criteria or expected behavior upon which the review is based. 3. Relevant test sources, test reports, or CI details, if available. G. Limitations and human handoff I cannot confirm that all acceptance criteria have been verified, nor can I conclude that a pull request (PR) is safe to approve based solely on a "green" CI status. The label `NO_EVIDENCE_IDENTIFIED_IN_SUPPLIED_MATERIALS` may be used when evidence is not visible, but this does not necessarily mean that such evidence does not exist within the repository or other systems. The final decision regarding a PR always rests with a human reviewer.