### 1. Routing Verdict * **Status:** **REVISE** * **Evidence mode:** **STATIC SIMULATION** * **Reason:** The uploaded definition has a generally strong routing boundary, but it describes a **ChatGPT skill-trigger testing harness**, not a customer-support escalation skill. It also has several clarification and overlap gaps that could produce premature activation. The simulation below evaluates the uploaded definition exactly as supplied. --- ### 2. Trigger Contract | Boundary | Routing contract | | ------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Owned job** | Evaluate the routing behavior of an existing ChatGPT workspace skill and produce trigger contracts, simulated or executed test cases, failure diagnoses, minimal description patches, and regression cases. | | **Must activate** | The user supplies or references an existing ChatGPT skill and asks to test triggers, diagnose incorrect skill selection, identify false positives or missed triggers, analyze overlap, or build routing regression cases. | | **May activate after clarification** | The user asks to “review,” “test,” or “audit” a skill without saying whether they mean routing behavior, task-output quality, security, structure, or marketplace readiness. | | **Must not activate** | Building a skill from scratch; reviewing task-output quality; auditing a Claude skill; designing a generic router unrelated to ChatGPT workspace skills; testing ordinary prompts rather than skill selection. | | **Required context** | At minimum, an existing ChatGPT skill definition. Neighbor definitions, workspace inventory, memory state, and runtime signals improve coverage but are not required for single-skill static simulation. | | **Output** | Routing verdict, trigger contract, coverage map, test matrix, failure register, metrics or projected risk, minimal patches, regression suite, and release decision. | | **Probable neighbors** | Skill builder, general skill auditor, prompt-quality evaluator, security auditor, Claude skill tester, generic intent-router evaluator. | | **Current-request mismatch** | The user called the artifact a customer-support escalation skill, but the uploaded artifact owns ChatGPT skill-routing evaluation. This requires clarification before treating it as an escalation skill. | --- ### 3. Coverage Map | Category | Coverage | | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | | Direct positives | Covered | | Positive paraphrases | Covered | | Compressed or informal requests | Covered | | Near-neighbor negatives | Covered | | Explicit exclusions | Covered | | Cross-skill collisions | Limited because no real neighboring inventory was supplied | | Ambiguous requests | Covered | | Missing-input cases | Covered | | Adversarial routing | Covered | | Multilingual requests | Limited because supported languages are not declared | | Conversation carryover | Specified conceptually, but not executable in static simulation | | Memory-sensitive behavior | Not testable; Memory state is unknown | | Runtime invocation evidence | Not available | --- ### 4. Test Matrix All predicted routes below are **SIMULATED**, not observed ChatGPT behavior. | ID | Test prompt | Expected route | Predicted route | Result | Evidence | | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | P-01 | “Test this ChatGPT skill’s trigger behavior and find false positives.” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Exact owned task and object | | P-02 | “Create a routing test matrix for this uploaded ChatGPT skill.” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Explicit routing evaluation | | PP-01 | “Tell me when this workspace skill will fire incorrectly.” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Paraphrase of false-positive testing | | PP-02 | “Check whether this skill steals requests from adjacent skills.” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Collision-testing intent | | PC-01 | “trigger test this skill” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Compressed but sufficiently specific | | PC-02 | “why did chatgpt pick wrong skill” | ACTIVATE:harness | ACTIVATE:harness | PASS | Description explicitly includes wrong-skill diagnosis | | FN-01 | “Make adversarial examples that prove when this skill should stay inactive.” | ACTIVATE:harness | POSSIBLE ABSTAIN | **FAIL** | Routing intent is present, but “adversarial examples” is not directly named as a user-facing trigger | | FN-02 | “Write an activation oracle for these workspace capabilities.” | ACTIVATE:harness | POSSIBLE ABSTAIN | **FAIL** | Procedure owns oracle construction, but description does not expose this vocabulary | | N-01 | “Improve the answers produced by this customer-support skill.” | ABSTAIN / neighbor | POSSIBLE ACTIVATE:harness | **FAIL** | “Test skill” context could pull the harness despite output-quality exclusion | | N-02 | “Rewrite this skill so it handles escalated customers better.” | ACTIVATE:skill-builder/editor | POSSIBLE ACTIVATE:harness | **FAIL** | Existing skill plus “rewrite” could overlap unless routing-only ownership is emphasized | | N-03 | “Audit this prompt for clarity, hallucinations, and answer quality.” | ABSTAIN / prompt auditor | ABSTAIN | PASS | Not skill-selection behavior | | X-01 | “Create a new customer-support escalation skill from scratch.” | ABSTAIN / builder | ABSTAIN | PASS | Explicit exclusion | | X-02 | “Test the trigger behavior of this Claude skill.” | ABSTAIN / Claude tester | ABSTAIN | PASS | Explicit exclusion