Skill Details
Runtime
(claude-5-opus)
Example user message
[userMessage]: Investigate checkout performance after our release. Comparable mobile lab traces use the same route, browser profile, network, CPU and cold-cache setup. Baseline LCP: 1.8 s; current: 2.5 s. Baseline checkout JS: 180 KB; current: 410 KB. The diff adds a new synchronous client dependency. No project performance budget was supplied.
Example agent response
# Web Performance Regression Investigation
## 1. Executive Regression Status
Final Status:
PERFORMANCE REGRESSION CONFIRMED
Primary Regression:
Checkout performance materially deteriorated under comparable supplied lab conditions.
Affected Scope:
Checkout route — supplied mobile lab profile.
Baseline Quality:
BASELINE VERIFIED
Comparison Quality:
COMPARABLE
Largest Supported Delta:
LCP +0.7 s
Checkout JavaScript +230 KB
Performance Budget / Target:
NOT SUPPLIED
Main Root Cause:
New synchronous client dependency is a likely material contributor.
Root-Cause Evidence State:
INFERRED / LIKELY
## 3. Evidence Inventory
VERIFIED / OBSERVED:
- Baseline LCP: 1.8 s
- Current LCP: 2.5 s
- Baseline JS: 180 KB
- Current JS: 410 KB
- New synchronous dependency exists in supplied diff
INFERRED / LIKELY:
- The dependency growth materially contributes to the observed performance regression.
NEEDS VERIFICATION:
- Exact share of LCP deterioration attributable to the new dependency
- Production field impact
## 5. Comparability Assessment
Comparison Quality:
COMPARABLE
Aligned Factors:
- same route
- same mobile profile
- same network
- same CPU
- same cold-cache condition
## 6. Performance Regression Map
| Surface / Metric | Baseline | Current | Delta | Comparison | Regression State | Finding |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|---|
| Checkout LCP | 1.8 s | 2.5 s | +0.7 s | COMPARABLE | REGRESSION OBSERVED | WPR-LCP-001 |
| Checkout JS | 180 KB | 410 KB | +230 KB | COMPARABLE | REGRESSION OBSERVED | WPR-BUNDLE-001 |
## 8. High-Priority Findings
| Finding ID | Title | Severity | Surface | Regression State | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPR-LCP-001 | Checkout LCP deterioration | HIGH | Checkout | REGRESSION OBSERVED | Slower primary-route rendering |
| WPR-BUNDLE-001 | Route bundle growth | HIGH | Checkout | REGRESSION OBSERVED | More transfer and client execution |
## 9. Detailed Regression Findings
### WPR-BUNDLE-001 — Checkout Bundle Growth
Domain:
Bundle / JavaScript
Severity:
HIGH
Evidence Status:
VERIFIED / OBSERVED
Affected Route:
Checkout
Baseline Evidence:
Previous comparable bundle report.
Current Evidence:
Current comparable bundle report.
Comparison Quality:
COMPARABLE
Baseline Measurement:
180 KB
Current Measurement:
410 KB
Absolute Delta:
+230 KB
Relative Delta:
+127.8%
Performance Budget / Target:
NOT SUPPLIED
Performance Change / Regression Evidence:
Comparable route bundle evidence directly shows an increase from 180 KB to 410 KB.
Regression State:
REGRESSION OBSERVED
Relevant Source / Change:
New synchronous client dependency in supplied diff.
Root Cause:
The newly added dependency is a likely material contributor to increased client-side resource cost.
Root-Cause Evidence State:
INFERRED / LIKELY
User Impact:
More JavaScript must be transferred and processed on a primary route.
Smallest Recommended Correction:
Remove the accidental synchronous route-level import or restore justified code splitting without changing required checkout functionality.
Correction Risk:
Lazy-loading timing, dependency initialization and checkout functionality.
Dependent Surfaces:
Any route sharing the same client dependency.
Re-Verification:
Repeat the same route bundle analysis and comparable checkout lab test.
## 15. Targeted Correction Plan
WPR-BUNDLE-001:
Restore appropriate route-level loading behavior for the added dependency.
WPR-LCP-001:
Re-test LCP after the bundle correction before attributing the entire LCP delta to that change.
## 16. Correction Regression Risks
Check:
- checkout functionality
- dependency initialization
- loading-state behavior
- shared routes
- code-split chunk delivery
## 17. Re-Verification Plan
Re-test using the same:
- route
- build mode
- browser profile
- device/emulation
- network
- CPU
- cache condition
One improved run alone should not be treated as production-wide resolution.
## 18. Unverified / Non-Comparable Areas
Production field impact:
NEEDS VERIFICATION
Source-level contribution to the full LCP delta:
NEEDS VERIFICATION beyond the current inference.
## 19. Final Regression Status
PERFORMANCE REGRESSION CONFIRMED
Comparable supplied evidence demonstrates material checkout deterioration. The regression is confirmed even though precise causal attribution remains partly inferred.
Or get it with Select10 Select prompts/mo — under $2 each
Learn moreBy purchasing this skill, you agree to our terms of service
CLAUDE-5-OPUS
Investigate whether website performance truly regressed against a meaningful baseline. This Claude Skill checks comparability, calculates supported deltas, separates current issues from confirmed regressions, traces evidence-backed root causes, recommends targeted corrections, assesses correction risk, and defines re-verification without inventing metrics, budgets, or test results.
...more
Added 5 days ago
