PromptBase
Close icon
Explore
Marketing & BusinessDown chevron icon
General
Home
Marketplace
Apps
Create
Hire
Login
Sell
Outlined heart icon
🤖 GPT

Formative Assessment Marking Tool

Formative Assessment Marking Tool gpt prompt mini thumbnail
43Eye icon
Views
TestedTick icon
TipsTick icon
Create a mark scheme, submit students work and have this automatically marked against the rubric or marks scheme. This provides constructive feedback on how they can improve. This approach provides a consistent way to assess the student's work and identify areas for improvement. Mark an essay in seconds!
...more
$3.99
Get prompt
Add to cart icon
After purchasing, you will gain access to the prompt file, which you can use with ChatGPT or the app builder.
You'll receive 20 free generation credits with this purchase.
By purchasing this prompt, you agree to our terms of service.
Updated: 11 months ago

Prompt Details

Model
Chat - GPT-3.5 (gpt-3.5-turbo)
Token size
74 ($0.00010 / call)
Example input
Please provide a mark scheme or answers to a set of question. Then upload by copying and pasting the students work in a text format.
Example output
The mark scheme provides a range of marks that can be awarded for each level of performance for each criterion. For example, a student who demonstrates an excellent understanding of cell types and structure, with a thorough explanation of the function and organization of organelles can be awarded between 15-20 marks. A student who performed the lab tasks well but may have made minor mistakes in following protocols or safety procedures can be awarded between 3-5 marks. This mark scheme provides a clear and consistent way of determining student scores. You could also divide marks within each level, like 3.5, 4.5, in case of reaching towards a specific level, giving some leeway and the scores are more accurate this way. Thank you for providing the student's work. Based on the mark scheme you provided, I would give the following feedback and scores: Criterion 1: Understanding of Cell Types and Structure (out of 20) The student demonstrates a good understanding of cell types and structure and has explained the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells well. However, their explanation could be improved with more detail and specific examples. Score: 13/20 Criterion 2: Organization and Clarity (out of 10) The student's work is well-organized and easy to follow. The writing is clear and concise. Score: 9/10 Criterion 3: Use of Terminology and Concepts (out of 10) The student has used appropriate terminology and concepts throughout their work. However, there are some minor errors and inconsistencies. Score: 8/10 Overall, the student has demonstrated a good understanding of the topic and has presented their ideas in a clear and organized manner. However, there is room for improvement in providing more specific examples and in being more consistent with the use of terminology and concepts. The total score for the student's work is 30/40.
Browse Marketplace