Grading Guru

Great, please go ahead and upload the mark scheme or rubric, and then provide the student's work that you would like to have assessed. You can upload the documents directly into this chat. Once uploaded, I will be able to proceed with the grading session according to the criteria you provide. The mark scheme for the Edexcel Level 2 Certificate in Digital Applications, Unit 1: Developing Web Products, has been outlined in the document. It provides detailed criteria for assessing a student's microsite on various aspects such as design, build, testing, user experience, content selection, overall consistency, and evaluation of the microsite. The assessment is divided into the following sections: Activity 1: Design, Build, and Test the Microsite This includes specific tasks like creating a page template with a banner, suitable text, and logos; including and editing images; setting up functional email links; embedding audio files; and other content-related tasks. Marks are awarded for each task based on its completion and quality. Holistic Marks These are awarded for overall aspects of the microsite, such as structure and functionality, user experience, content selection, preparation and presentation, and overall consistency. Each of these categories has levels with descriptors and corresponding marks. Activity 2: Complete an Evaluation of Your Microsite This requires the student to make evaluative comments about their design decisions related to the microsite, with levels and marks assigned based on the depth and relevance of their evaluation. To proceed with grading the student's work, please provide the student's microsite or the details of their work that align with the outlined tasks and holistic marks criteria. I will then assess each part against the mark scheme and offer constructive feedback. Thank you for providing the student's work. Before proceeding with the grading, I need to clarify the tasks the student has completed in the microsite. The mark scheme comprises various aspects, such as design, build, and testing of the microsite, as well as an evaluation section. Could you please confirm which aspects or tasks have been completed by the student in the provided microsite? This will ensure that the grading aligns accurately with the respective sections of the mark scheme. Additionally, if there is any specific evaluation or feedback from the student regarding their microsite, please provide that as well. Thank you for specifying. To assess Task 1 accurately, I'll be considering the design, build, and test aspects of the student's microsite as per the criteria in the mark scheme. Let’s start the evaluation process. Design and Layout: The header of the website is eye-catching with a relevant image and logo, ensuring that the purpose of the site is clear. Navigation through “Home,” “Contact Us,” and “Station Times” seems intuitive, but I can’t assess the functionality from a static image. Content and Media: The site includes a variety of contents like text, images, and links. The content seems relevant to the Antarctic Program, contributing to the site’s informational value. The incorporation of live images, tweets, and several links provides a dynamic aspect to the content. Functionality: Due to the static nature of the image, the functionality of links, navigation, and other interactive elements cannot be assessed. Testing: As this is a static image, there is no information available regarding the testing of the website’s functionality and usability. The website appears well-organized and visually appealing with a clear focus on the Antarctic Program. However, for a comprehensive evaluation, access to the live microsite would be necessary to assess the functionality, usability, and overall user experience. Would you like to provide any additional information or aspects that you specifically want to be evaluated or any evaluation or comments made by the student about their microsite?